Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Leif V Singman who wrote (1057)	11/20/1997 9:19:00 AM
From: Diogeron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5390

Leif, you have the annoying (to Mr. Rhodes, most likely) habit of letting facts get in the way of a good rant.

To: Leif V Singman who wrote (1057)	11/20/1997 2:28:00 PM
From: DWB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5390

Leif, Face it, Caxton just came over here to lob a couple of unsupported CDMA grenades, then couldn't stand the heat when we asked for specifics. Personal opinion is great, and talking to salespeople is nice too, but everyone has an agenda.. even the all holy Qualcomm and their distributors. If we want to debate CDMA vs GSM, then lets look at the company profits or stock performance and compare that way. As someone mentioned, ERICY and QCOM were both trading at $46 recently, after which QCOM has made a substantial move... to which I'd respond, that's great, but QCOM only made that move after sitting dead in the water for the better part of 2 years, while ERICY has more than doubled over the same timeframe (plus paying out dividends). And as for being focused on the past, I'll admit, I enjoy looking back at all the money ERICY has made me, but expect similar gains in the future. If ERICY shareholders are "sitting backwards in our saddles", at least we've got a "horse" to ride (which is taking us forward anyway...), and not a one trick Shetland pony... DWB Long ERICY and loving it...