Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:35:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

My private telephone lines are open 718-331-1960 RG

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:36:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Subject: New Count-IRA shares added RMIL-ALL-Share@psicop.com Well it appears that some on the list and those on SI want a total count of all shares and those on SI added together. I am going to do this, but my foundation list will remain private. I will be issuing a shareholder number instead of a name. Everyone on the list need to reconfirm these 4 questions. TOTAL RMIL shares owned: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total RMIL shares called in name form (including received cert's.): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total RMIL shares received in certificate form: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total IRA Shares owned: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:38:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

This is the release that caused my National Press release in rebuttal. ........ PALM SPRINGS, Calif., Nov. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Dempsey Mork announced today that he has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Central District of California, against Rocky Mountain International Rocky Mountain trades on the OTC bulletin board under the symbol "RMII." The other defendants are Gary Morgan, Roland Breton, Micheal Puhr, Lorinda Liang, Wen Lan, Transecurites International, Lazar Levine & Co., Florida Stock Transfer, Riley G. Mathews, Scott Meyer, and World Marketing Alliance. The charges against the parties are for fraud, stock manipulation, conspiracy, the sale and distribution of unregistered securities, publishing false and misleading information, and violation of securities laws. Mork is prepared to prove in court that the defendants have manipulated the market for Rocky Mountain/Olympus stock from $.20 to $3.50 per share based on two sham transactions. According to Mork, "The first sham transaction was when Rocky Mountain, then named Olympus, announced an agreement to acquire a company named Palco. Prior to the announcement, Olympus' stock was trading at $.20 per share. The price of Olympus' stock rose to $4.00 per share on the announcement. The sham was that there was no Palco deal. "The second sham transaction was when Rocky Mountain, then named Olympus announced it had acquired a Wyoming based water bottling company with $21 million in assets. The $21 million in assets turns out to be a former veterinarian clinic used for bottling water with one employee. The maximum value of the facilities is under $100,000. "In addition to the sham transactions, certain of the defendants have swindled investors by issuing themselves enormous amounts of shares. At the beginning of this year, investors owned all of the approximately 1,000,000 shares of Olympus. Since then, defendants Morgan and Breton issued themselves 2 million shares of free stock, that had a market value of $7,000,000; plus an additional 4 million shares with a market value of $14,000,000 for which they will pay $4,000. Morgan and Breton at one time owned 6,000,000 out of 7,000,000 shares issued. "Morgan and Benton sought and obtained the assistance of the other defendants, who acted in various capacities, all of which assisted Morgan, Benton, and other stock promoters in manipulating the market of Rocky Mountain securities, and the sale and distribution of restricted Securities." For further information contact Dempsey Mork at 760-360-1042. SOURCE Dempsey Mork /CONTACT: Dempsey Mork at 760-360-1042/

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:39:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:17:30 -0500 Subject: Ovis Cartel Riley, I appreciate very much that you have been gracious enough to post a couple e-mails to SI for me. Frankly, prior to OVIS, I felt no compulsion to join SI, and now I must wait two weeks to post there. There have been some speculation on this and other threads that the Cartel is in some way illegally manipulating a price. I would like to dispel that rumor. Legislation under the Securities and Exchange Act was directed at Sindicates (not cartels). Their destructive practice was to accumulate based on insider information, shared through a network of good ol' boys that were privileged bankers, ceos and the like who withheld information from the public if it suited them in their accumulation phase, and then distributed into weak hands. That illegal practice has nothing to do with grass roots enthusiasm for a stock, sharing of public information and opinion and certificate calling. Don't be so nervous people. The Ovis Cartel's actions are virtually the OPPOSITE of the actions of a syndicate. Can the paranoia. Every armchair lawyer in SI land wants to sound like a personal friend of the SEC. I was looking for a historical precedent, and though I haven't compiled a massive list of successful squeezes, (no time) I like the example of Northern Pacific. Overvalued at 110, it shot up to one thousand dollars, a bears worst nightmare. What is most interesting, is that after the squeeze, it didn't tank back to or below it's pre-squeeze price, and didn't fall below three hundred. In terms of dollars per share this is a massive increase, in terms of percentage gain, it is only an extra thousand percent or so, oh well. Ovis is a different animal of course, actually more ripe for growth than an over valued large cap. Many would like to scoff Ovis faithfuls hopes of large gains, but they fail to realize that these situations are common in the generalities of remarkable companies. This is exactly how small companies become big companies. Watch it happen. Better yet, come on board.

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:40:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Thanks for your interest in the OVIS shareholder cartel. On August 22, at around noon the cartel dropped the hammer and started calling in certs for their stock. This happened when several Market Markers were banding together to drop the bottom out of the stock. We as shareholders MUST all call for the stock certs as this will force the estimated 2 million plus shorts to cover there position. ------- for further information read the messages by Riley G at: exchange2000.com

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:43:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Think of how many shareholders do not have email, internet access, etc. I and others estimate that there are over 2 million EXTRA shares in the public float that should not be there! The only way to force the those concerned to call for your stock certificates. THIS action has nothing to do with type 1 or 2 accounts (cash/Margin). We are talking about the selling of stock that does not exist and must be covered in a short squeeze. Can you see why OVIS forum has been invaded by the naysayers and personal attacks of me and others. ------------------------------------------------- Comments..... "Oops...one VERY last thought. If this really was a pump and dump, don't you think the founder "pumpers" would have dumped at 4 and disappeared? Keep signing up everyone. And hang together (or we shall surely hang separately - thanks, Ben Franklin)." Todate, I still own every bit of OVIS that I have bought from Aug. 5, 1997. This is not about money with me as I have all I need in life. It is more a righting a wrong that has gone on long enough and I am sick and tired (as many others are) of the blatant stock manipluation of stock prices and selling of nonexistent shares to flood the market of a certain stock with the hopes of the Market Markers to force a terminal short and never having to cover their ill gotten gains. You see it's personal and I'll ride this one to the bottom and never sell, or ride this one up and sell it to those who exploted many other investors in the past. Stand up and fight back. United We Stand!!! Call your stock certificates from your brokers. This is the only way to force the short squeeze on those concerned. Pay no attention to those whom try and distract us in our work, that's why they are here. To create doubt in the minds of those reading for the fist time. I told you they would be here, and they are. I even told everyone that there would be personal attacks on me, and there are, I have told everyone how to play this one out. Now DEMAND for the DELIVERY of your STOCK CERTIFICATES in OVIS. Those just buying in should order the CERTIFICATES at the time of the trade.. Riley G

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:44:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Subject: Reasons Riley, feel free to post, not post, edit, change, etc. this message. As you are comm central and well informed, I have confidence in your decisions regarding relaying my sometimes too lengthy E-mails. Preponderance of evidence that OVIS will fly: 1. Massive naked short position. Simple arithmetic looking at past volume confirms this. Some people who count volume haven't even taken into account the die hard buy and holders from pre-split days (I am one of these and there are quite a few others). 2. Cartel rough figure estimates based on sharing of information by shareholders far outnumber the authorized float - so much so that even a massive degree of inaccuracy on the part of the cartel still outnumbers the authorized float. Early Cartel rough estimates which were low and didn't include non SI/Cartel supporters, don't even include the million or so shares bought and called for since last Fridays "call your cert message"! 3. More people are buying and calling certs every day. 4. Shares outstanding are confirmed by transfer agent. 5. Wildcard shares are locked up in treasury account and pension plan. 6. The company supports the investors and promises not to distribute more shares. 7. The market makers have requested more shares from the company who firmly replied "No way!". These are desperate actions that reveal much about the mms situation. It doesn't take a sherlock to see mm desperation in this request for more shares. 8. The market makers have manipulated the price drastically since profound interest in the stock and certificate calling have begun. If the market makers were doing fine as some have implied, they would not be dropping the ask on buys, passing over market orders to sweep up cheap shares, selling below ask limits to confound investors, etc. We have seen the price drop on buy/sell ratios of greater than 10 to 1. That is called unethical market manipulation, and if you are a mm, you don't risk doing it unless you are in incredible trouble. Here is a simple rule: MARKET MANIPULATION ON GROWING STOCKS = MARKET MAKERS IN TROUBLE 9. The preponderance of naysayers actually confirm the validity of the cartels position. We are forced to wonder, if the OVIS shareholders are such dupes, and we are going to loose so much money (save me please) why then the constant attacks by non-shareholders and people who haven't ever been heard from before. Why the new faces with misinformation? This had occurred to the degree of cartel members receiving threats. People don't threaten you just for being stupid. Once again, it doesn't take a sherlock to see the determination being mustered against a bunch of innocent investors simply legally calling for their certificates. Why are so many resources being marshalled to stop a bunch of investors from doing what is perfectly reasonable? Explain again why is it now that I shouldn't buy shares of a company I like and call for my certs? It is a good sign of mm desperation. here is another simple rule: UNSOLICITED AND UNSUPPORTED NEGATIVITY FROM STRANGERS WHO DON"T REALLY LOVE YOU = SCARED SHORTERS 10. Inherent value of OVIS. A couple weeks ago this stock sold for 19 cents. At 1.6 million shares it had a market cap of about 300,000 dollars. About the price of a nice single family dwelling. Get real. If this reflected OVIS value, Hard Core would have sued them for slander for even implying that they were doing a deal. Banks would have laughed at them when they asked for capital instead of setting them up with excellent financing. You can't start a halfway decent chicken stand for 300,000 dollars if you plan on having plates and silverware too. Ovis earnings, assets, tax credits, and client base are those of a company firmly worth a minimum of 2.50 per share, and that is if they were never ever planning on growing! Counting for growth,future profitability, common PE valuations etc, the company is worth around 15. There are companies that loose more money per share than OVIS costs per share that sell for 50+ dollars per share. Simple rule: Simple rule: COMPANIES THAT CAN CONDUCT BUSINESS DESPITE DEVALUED SHARES AND MARKET CAP HAVE EXCELLENT RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT. 11. Past value of OVIS. BAck when this company had poor management, the market still valued it at prices that are dramatic multiples of it's current price. Most of you can't remember back when people were gobbling up millions of shares of OVIS at 14 cents per share PRE SPLIT! because the evidence for future profitability was there. Back then, 14 cents a share was considered a bargain basement deal on this company. Of course no one knew back then that when the company split in order to get on a bigger board that a bunch of manipulative mms would do everything they could to kill this stock rather than loose money covering their naked shorts. The company did the unthinkable, and accidentally made money. oooopps!!! Simple rule: COMPANIES THAT MAKE MONEY ARE WORTH MONEY. If you are in OVIS, you picked a great time to be here. Statistics show that only one out of three companies survive two years past startup. Of those who make it, the average time to profitability is 3 - 5 years. OVIS has finally made it. The preponderance of evidence that this stock will fly is uncommon and fantastic. Investors can wait years for situations like these to happen. Should you mortgage your home? no. Should you go buy a Mercedes? no. Should you count your chickens before they hatch? no. Should you hold this stock into the thirties? Darn right.

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:45:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Florida Atlantic Transfer 5701 N. Pine Island Rd. Suite 310B Tamarac, FL 33321 Telephone: 954-726-4954 reference: Rocky Mountain International LTD (RMIL) cusip: 774719 10 8 1. Do Not Sign certificates for exchange. There is also a $12 fee per certificate! Remember that you do not need to exchange the certificates, as they are still VALID! 2. Make a simple cover letter stating that you want to exchange your old Olympus Ventures, Inc. certificates for the newer Rocky Mountain International Ltd. ones. 3. Mail or FedEx this to the address listed above ( Registred, return receipt for USPS mail) --- PLEASE note that you do not have to go through your broker if you already have the certificate in hand. You can do it all your self. Just follow the instructions above. PS. make a copy of the certificate for yourself before sending. Nice to have for tax reason or lost mail.

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:45:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

FWD Message: Subject: INTERSTING ITEM! Riley, Guess what? We heard some real interesting stories that has been happening in the TA office...... 1. Dempsey Mork is very well known in the old TA office. 2. Dempsey Mork has been seen in the old TA office on more than one occasion and he was seen leaving the office VERY UPSET! 3. Somebody in the TA office, a high ranking officer, is very upset with the whole situation about OVIS. The same person hates Gary Morgan very much. (Could it be that this person is short also? hmmmm!) This person is Dempsey Mork's friend. 4. Somebody was told to handtype the certificates instead of printing them. (VERY INTERESTING). No wonder it takes forever for the last certificate to be typed processed. I guess if an officer of the old TA office is short, then he/she would try to slow down the process also. After speaking to RANDALL BAKER of the Magellan law suit and then this findings from yesterday afternoon, I BELIEVE WE NOT ONLY NAILED THIS ONE BUT WE EVEN BURIED IT SIX FEET! There's no more stopping the SHORT SQUEEZE now. The short squeeze will hit in different directions now. hehehehehe! GO OVIS! IT'S PARTY TIME FOLKS!!!!!!! LET'S GET READY RUMBLLLLLLLLLE!

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:48:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

An illegal posting of private atorney correspondance by a nay. I wonder how they received it? --- siliconinvestor.com To: Riley G (11927 ) From: mawork1 Thursday, Oct 2 1997 5:48PM EST Reply #11955 of 12558 Letter from Magellan's Lawyer to OVIS's Lawyer Lawrence R. Moon 11024 North 28th Drive, Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85029 Olympus Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") Dear Mr. Moon: I received your letter of August 29, 1997. Although I have no obligation to respond to your letters, I feel impelled to do so. I know you are in an impossible position and have my sympathy. Form S-8 A Form S-8 as a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. As you know, if the plan of distribution as set forth in the registration changes, a registration statement must be amended before use. Your Stock Option Plan on file with the SEC provides for shares to be issued upon exercise of options. It does not provide for outright issuances of shares. The S-8 only registers the shares issuable pursuant to the plan. However, the March 1997 10-Q does not state that options were granted and exercised. It states that shares were issued for services, not for option exercises. The approximately 1.7 million shares issued were accordingly not issued under the plan and were therefore not issuable under the S-8. They are restricted securities. You doubtless gave an opinion to the transfer agent that they were duly registered, but you were wrong. I understand that many of these shares were issued to persons in the financial public relations business. I draw your attention to public statements by the Commission where it states that such persons cannot receive securities under an S-8. You are correct that the consent of Lazar, Levine and Company LLP (the auditor for the 1996 audit) was attached to the Form S-8. But, there is no consent of the firm(s) which audited 1995 and 1994. In addition, Part II Item 4 of the S-8 (which requires a description of securities) was not complied with. The S-8 states that this was "not applicable". However, the Commission's instructions state "if the class of securities to be offered is not registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, set for the information required by Item 202 of Regulation S-K." Olympus does not have a class of securities registered under Section 12 - it has never filed a Form 10 or Form 8-A and does not have a 1934 Act file number. Therefore your S-8 is invalid. The S-8 was not signed by the chief financial officer as required. As to the 10-K: 1. If Gary Morgan were unaware of the identity of management he should obtain a mirror, instead of stating in the 10-K that management had no information as to the identity of management. 2. Gary Morgan should obtain a copy of a shareholders list from the transfer agent, which would be highly useful in determining the identity of shareholders, instead of stating in the 10-K that management had no information about is share ownership. Possibly Mr. Morgan might remember how many shares he himself owns and disclose that in the 10-K. 3. The Company should include the reports of the auditor and the financial statements for fiscal 1994 and 1995 with the 10-K for 1995. If the financial statements were unavailable for 1994 and 1995 and the auditor, due to the state of the financial records, was unable to give an unqualified opinion for 1996 the Company would be ineligible to use Regulation D, Form S-8 and Category 2 of Regulation S until such time as the Company had three years of unqualified audits. In summary, based in my experience with the staff of the Commission, I believe they would view the issuance of almost 1.7 million shares under Form S-8 to outside "consultants" by a company with 1.4 million shares outstanding as an abuse. In addition, you have a company which has undergone a change of control in the past 12 months. There is no public disclosure as to who controls the Company, the experience of management, no audited results of operations, and the vast majority of shares were issued to unknown person for services. This looks exactly like the classic fraud cases brought recently by the Commission (Teletec, Sky Scientific) against management, promoters and brokers. The stock, as you say, is trading high on news of a "tentative, but lucrative" letter of intent on an acquisition for which no financial information has been provided. As a fellow legal professional, I remind you of the Commission's view in the Carter-Johnson case that a lawyer for the issuer must "take affirmative steps in order to avoid the interference that he has been co-opted, willingly or unwillingly, into the scheme of non-disclosure," and not be "cast as a dupe or a shield for a wrongdoing client" in order to avoid prosecution under Rule 102(c). Very truly yours, Signature

To: KMT who wrote (20124)	11/19/1997 9:51:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Shareholder letter to brokers and NASD. Send certified/Return-receipt... -------------------------------- Your Name Address City, State Zip code Phone: Number Date Broker Name Address City, State Zip I do hereby make a formal request (DEMAND) that (number of shares) of Rocky Mountain International LTD. (BB: RMIL) cusip: 774719 10 8, be transferred from Street name and into my NAME. I understand that (Brokerage name) may charge may account a set fee per certificate order. My Account Information Account Holder: Name Account Number: xxxxxxxxxxx SSN: xxx-xx-xxxx Security to transfer: Rocky Mountain International LTD. (BB: RMIL) Formally known as: Olympus Ventures, Inc. (BB: OVIS) Cusip: 774719 10 8 Amount of shares to transfer:xxxxxxxxxx Transfer Agent Information: Florida Atlantic Transfer 5701 N. Pine Island Rd. Suite 310B Tamarac, FL 33321 Telephone: 954-726-4954 Copies of this formal request are being forwarded to the offices of the NASD, and Rocky Mountain International, Ltd. to ensure prompt delivery of my certificate(s). _______________________________ Name SSN: xxx-xx-xxxx CC: NASD CC: RMIL offices =====================cut==========cut========= nasdr.com NASD District Offices -------------------------------------------------------------------------- District 1 525 Market Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94105-2711 (415) 882-1200 Fax: (415) 546-6991 Elisabeth P. Owens, Director Northern California (the counties of Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, and Inyo, and the remainder of the state north or west of such counties), northern Nevada (the counties of Esmeralda and Nye, and the remainder of the state north or west of such counties), and Hawaii District 2 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 627-2122 Fax: (213) 617-3299 Lani M. Sen Woltmann, Director Southern California (that part of the state south or east of the counties of Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, and Inyo), southern Nevada (that part of the state south or east of the counties of Esmeralda and Nye), and the former U.S. Trust Territories District 3 Denver Republic Office Building 370 17th Street, Suite 2900 Denver, CO 80202-5629 (303) 446-3100 Fax: (303) 620-9450 Frank Birgfeld, V.P., Director Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming District 3 Seattle Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 1616 Seattle, WA 98101-2327 (206) 624-0790 Fax: (206) 623-2518 James G. Dawson, Associate Director Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington District 4 12 Wyandotte Plaza 120 West 12th Street, Suite 900 Kansas City, MO 64105 (816) 421-5700 Fax: (816) 421-5029 Jack Rosenfield, V.P., Director Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota District 5 1100 Poydras Street Suite 850, Energy Centre New Orleans, LA 70163 (504) 522-6527 Fax: (504) 522-4077 Warren A. Butler, Jr., V.P., Director Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Tennessee District 6 12801 North Central Expressway, Suite 1050 Dallas, TX 75243 (972) 701-8554 Fax: (972) 716-7646 Thomas M. McNatt, Director Texas District 7 One Securities Centre, Suite 500 3490 Piedmont Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30305 (404) 239-6100 Fax: (404) 237-9290 Marilyn B. Davis, Director Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Puerto Rico, the Canal Zone, and the Virgin Islands District 8 Chicago 10 S. LaSalle St., 20th Floor Chicago, IL 60603-1002 (312) 899-4400 Fax: (312) 236-3025 Carlotta A. Romano, Director Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin District 8 Cleveland Renaissance on Playhouse Sq. 1350 Euclid Ave., Suite 650 Cleveland, OH 44115 (216) 694-4545 Fax: (216) 694-3048 William H. Jackson, Jr., Director Ohio and part of upstate New York (the counties of Monroe, Livingston, and Steuben, and the remainder of the state west of such counties) District 9 Philadelphia 11 Penn Center 1835 Market Street, 19th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 665-1180 Fax: (215) 496-0434 John P. Nocella, Sr. V.P., Director Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and southern New Jersey (the counties of Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Ocean, and Salem) District 10 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004-2193 (212) 858-4000 Fax: (212) 858-4189 Martin Kuperberg, Sr. V.P., Director The five boroughs of New York City and the adjacent counties in New York (the counties of Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Suffolk, Westchester) and northern New Jersey (the state of New Jersey, except for the counties of Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Ocean, and Salem) District 11 260 Franklin St., 16th Floor Boston, MA 02110 (617) 261-0800 Fax: (617) 951-2337 Willis Riccio, V.P., Director Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and New York (except for the counties of Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester; the counties of Monroe, Livingston, and Steuben; the remainder of the state west of such counties; and the five boroughs of New York City)