SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 7:59:16 AM
From: lorne7 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
kenny ..Check out the difference between your kind and responsible Americans

OWS ..bunch filthy of slobs... Tea party ,decent Americans who care about their country.

Richmond Tea Party Wants Refund from VA Capitol for Land that Occupy is Now Using for Free
Amanda Gaines
WMAL.com
wmal.com


RICHMOND -- The Richmond Tea Party wants its money back from the city of Richmond for the cost of permits and other fees to use the same area in which Occupy Richmond has settled for nearly the past two weeks for free.

The local branch of the Tea Party says it should be reimbursed for all the fees accrued and paid over the past three years for use of Kanawha Plaza, a city-owned square across from the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank and a few blocks from Virginia state capitol buildings. Occupy Richmond, an affiliate with the Occupy Wall Street movement, moved into the square on October 15 and has not been charged a bill from the city.

A city employee who worked with the Tea Party to get permits for the plaza "told us that the occupiers have not paid for the park, have not paid for the permit, there's no sanitation, there's no trash pick-up -- nothing we had to pay for. They've done none of that," Colleen Owens, spokesperson for the Richmond Tea Party, told WMAL.com.

Owens says an invoice is not complete, but so far the Tea Party is looking to collect about $8,000 from the city of Richmond.

"It's obvious, it's so blatant, that basically we're punished for following the law -- which, of course, we didn't complain, we complied with everything they asked for," Owens said.

The Tea Party paid for use of the park, police, emergency personnel, port-o-potties, and other fees, Owens says.

"They're [Occupy Richmond] breaking the law. We complied with the law and the city of Richmond is not applying the law equally," she said.




To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:30:41 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 
the administration has "elevated the status of Muslim-Brotherhood-spawned groups that are admittedly sworn to our very death and destruction."



To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:32:44 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 224708
 
Napolitano's choice of Elibiary, ----------------a "dereliction of duty" that is undermining national security.



To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:34:40 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 



Honoring Khomeini

In 2004, Elibiary was one of seven advertised speakers at an Irving, Texas, conference called "A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary," celebrating the 16th anniversary of Khomeini's death.

In an interview with WND at the time, Elibiary claimed he was not aware of the event's general theme and "tribute" to Khomeini.



To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:36:13 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 
Mohamed Elibiary

Poole said he received confirmation from a left-leaning media outlet that Elibiary had recently approached them, asking to do a story attacking the Texas DPS.

A source with the media outlet told Poole that Elibiary approached them with reports marked "For Official Use Only" that the Texas Muslim leader claimed "showed a pattern of Islamophobia at the department."

The media source said the reports were not as Elibiary "had billed them to us," and they saw "nothing remotely resembling Islamophobia."

"I think he was hoping we would bite and not give it too much of a look in light of the other media outfits jumping on the Islamophobia bandwagon," the source told Poole.

The source said it was clear that Elibiary, in an attempt to promote himself, wanted to be quoted as a source in the story.

The source noted his outlet has used Elibiary as an unnamed source in previous stories.









To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:38:49 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 

one year ago, Napolitano swore in Elibiary as a member of her Homeland Security Advisory Council. Elibiary has been a strong supporter of the radical Islamic theologian Sayyid Qutb, whose teachings inspired and continue to govern al-Qaida and Islamic jihadist organizations worldwide.


WND reported in 2004 that Elibiary spoke at a conference that honored the founder of the Iranian Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini. Elibiary has strongly criticized the U.S. government's prosecution of fundraisers for Hamas and is a defender of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which FBI evidence shows is a front group for Hamas.


asked the DHS chief if she was aware that Elibiary delivered a speech at the pro-Khomeini event.

She replied only with, "I'm not aware of all the places he has spoken."

The Texas lawmaker asked Napolitano if she knew that Elibiary is alleged to have accessed the Homeland Security State and Local Intelligence Community of Interest database Oct. 19 from his home and used material he found to shop a story to a media outlet on "Islamophobia" directed at Texas Gov. Rick Perry and his state government.

Napolitano said she was not aware.

.......

, Napolitano said that since she didn't know the facts,

..................................................

Poole's report said that Texas Department of Public Safety officials have confirmed that Elibiary has access to the Homeland Security State and Local Intelligence Community of Interest database, which contains hundreds of thousands of intelligence reports and products.



To: lorne who wrote (116480)10/28/2011 8:51:36 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
So the US Dept of Homeland Security UNDERMINES the security of the US by giving islamists access to its confidential database.



To: lorne who wrote (116480)11/4/2011 9:51:19 PM
From: Ann Corrigan5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
Ken has to choose sides - will he support the Democrat Pres who enabled 9/11 or the current incompetent Marxist?

washingtonpost.com