SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (453765)10/31/2011 3:50:58 PM
From: Nadine Carroll10 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793955
 
From what Cain is saying, it was the association that paid the women; Cain wasn't part of the settlement and claims to have no knowledge of it. I don't think it will hurt him much, if this is all there is. People understand that just because somebody made some money by claiming to be offended by somebody's words, it doesn't necessarily mean that the words were really that offensive. For all we know, this is over Cain calling some woman "darling" and complimenting her appearance.



To: ManyMoose who wrote (453765)10/31/2011 4:47:56 PM
From: FJB  Respond to of 793955
 
RE:sexual scandal

I guess it is working, because it has already gone from he made someone "uncomfortable" to sexual scandal, WHERE THERE WAS NO SEX INVOLVED.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News