Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GlobalMarine who wrote (27764)	11/20/1997 1:46:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Rand: Yeah I read that. Of course, it did say "at least," so I guess they could have done it more than twice. I would guess it is a little different than flipping a coin. If you do an assay twice, and it comes out .3579 ounces per ton both times, you are probably a little more assured of repeatability than if you flip a coin twice.

To: GlobalMarine who wrote (27764)	11/20/1997 1:57:00 AM
From: Proton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Re: Where's Sam Ervin When You Need Him? IPM's June press release said that "...the assay of the same samples was done at least two times to confirm consistency and repeatability of results." Nice catch, Rand. All in all, it's a... nother brick in the wall... Pý p.s. too many nice people are leaving this thread right now for me to speak my mind about the timing of some other announced departures. Chuca has me on notice about babies and bathwater, dontchaknow.