Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (634600)	11/4/2011 4:22:09 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579676

>> This is Cain's personal issue. Why do you need to know her name? Her motivation is clearly political. 100% political. If not, she could have stayed out of it. Neither she nor her personal reputation would have been damaged because no one would have known who she was. I just think at some point there has to be some fairness in this process. Cain is being assaulted by the liberal media, aided by people who were paid a settlement with the provision they not discuss it, and now she wants to discuss it. Conveniently, when there is an opportunity to get more money after she already agreed to a smaller sum. In my life I've never seen a clearer instance of political trickery. Executed expertly, but apparently backfiring, I might add. Still, there ought to be some price to be paid for false accusations of this nature. And they're laid it on thick. Two apparently disgruntled employees plus a couple of obviously fictional accounts. I respect the fact you have a different view. I just don't think it is right for someone to be slimed in the media like Cain has been. If he committed the offenses, then prove it. Otherwise, they ought STFU.

To: Bill who wrote (634600)	11/4/2011 4:31:43 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579676

Bill, > This is Cain's personal issue. Why do you need to know her name? Can anyone explain to me why the accuser "doesn't want to be another Anita Hill"? Because the way I see it, she already is. Tenchusatsu