SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (175487)11/7/2011 8:24:59 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 542009
 
Why do Finnish schools do so well? Because they have a tiny homogeneous society where everyone is fairly well educated, and there is a universal respect for education, and they have excellent social services to support the dysfunctional. None of that applies in the US. No big mystery about Finland's success.

If you recall the tracking fracas in the schools, you will understand the power of homogeneous classes. It is so easy to teach groups of similar young people, and very hard to teach classes with many different children- especially when some of the children are not fluent in the native language being taught. That's an education killer. Fins are fluent in Finnish, and they don't have an immigrant population to speak of.

hudson-ny.org

They don't like immigrants, and they don't have many, so their schools remain "pure". That makes it easier to teach.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (175487)11/7/2011 10:03:26 AM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542009
 
Because the parents tech the kids in Finland!! Same with all educated parents. Educated prents make sure etheir kids get educated if they have to use chalk boards! Half of what my kids know came from my wives and me.

But when the parents cannot or won't teach the kids then it is up to society.

Kids born in middle class families self actualize with a 50/50 ratio i.e. 50% genes and 50% nurture. But kids born in ghettos it is 10/90 i.e. 10% genes and 90% nurture. So that is where society has to come in with programs like head start to supplant the lackof parents involvement. Best for society to get them educated one way or the other.

The good thing about kids going to lots of public schools which have the good the bad and the ungly teachers is that they will still get a good education and most importantly having randon teachers which avois the death nail of eucation, "DOGMA"!

<<
There is plenty of blame to go around and deservedly so. Teachers blame society/parents and society blames teachers. Just another of those issues that is ripe for a man of vision and leadership otherwise nothing will change. Why do Finnish schools do so good? They spend little money on education (comparatively), kids don't have homework, kids don't start school until they are seven and they are for the most part latch-key children.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (175487)11/7/2011 12:18:49 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542009
 
On the assumption in these arguments that our "schools are failing," I don't agree. My up close and personal experience with one NJ suburban public school is that they are doing quite well thank you. My guess is that the category--suburban public schools are also doing reasonably well. The problem lies in the long running failure of the political system to address inner city woes, education prime among them. And, for that matter, rural education.