SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117144)11/7/2011 9:46:44 AM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
Obama’s #OccupyDC Victim Speaks Out: ‘I Went Down Those Stairs Because I Was Pushed’



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117144)11/7/2011 9:47:40 AM
From: joefromspringfield3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Ken

I carry no brief for the Republican party. If you are saying many of them are also crooks I will not defend them. They are mostly petty crooks compared to the democrat criminal conspiracy.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117144)11/7/2011 9:47:53 AM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224744
 
Clinton Harassment Accuser Willey: I’d Vote For Cain



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117144)11/7/2011 10:14:15 AM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224744
 
WAIT! Are Banks Way More Profitable Under Obama Than They Were Under Bush?

Wall Street firms — either independent companies or the high-flying trading arms of banks — are doing even better. They’ve made more profit in the first 2 1/2 years of the Obama administration than they did during the entire Bush administration, industry data show.

Wow! That's quite a stat.

Read more: businessinsider.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117144)11/7/2011 2:07:39 PM
From: tonto4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Kenneth, why did Clinton borrow from the SS when he had that supposed "surplus"? You believed he had surpluses because they did not report using SS Trust funds as a debt. How dishonest do you believe that to be? It worked, those who do not follow reporting still report the headlines that they read...

Both parties have been borrowing for over 27 years from the fund. Except for the dishonest reporting, nothing has been found to be incorrect by the Advisory Committee.