SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chartseer who wrote (117327)11/9/2011 4:09:52 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224757
 
Media Doubling Down on Racist Attempts to Destroy Cain
.............................................................................................................
NBC’s David Gregory: GOP has no “Grand Wizard” to force out Cain


11/09/2011 | Ed Morrissey
hotair.com


Well, that makes sense. After all, the political party of the Ku Klux Klan wasn’t the Republicans, was it? Click the image to watch:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

Ann Curry, NBC News: “He’s not stepping down, continuing to suck the air out of the narrative the Republican party really wants to tell. Does the party now wish he would just go away?”

David Gregory, NBC News: “Well there is no, you know, grand wizard in the party right now who can really force the issue. I’ve talked to Cain’s advisers in Iowa, they think their support is still strong there, that it’s not falling. There may be cracks in the foundation according to pollsters I’m talking to, that his numbers may be starting to shift but right now core support remains there.”

So … what’s the implication here? That the Democratic Party has “grand wizards” that can boot candidates out of presidential races against their will? That’s absurd on the face of it, and all anyone has to do is note Dennis Kucinich’s two runs at the Presidency for proof. Parties lost the explicit ability to control the candidates when the open primary began prevailing over the open convention model. It’s true that political-party establishments can coax or discourage candidacies at every level, but that doesn’t work when the candidate doesn’t hold any elective office at the moment and has enough money to run his or her own campaign.

Besides the jaw-dropping reference to the Klan, the statement is absurd on its face anyway. It’s the same as lamenting that a Deus ex machina doesn’t actually exist to solve a specific, momentary problem of any kind. Those only existed in Greek theater, not real life, much like the “grand wizards” in Gregory’s head that handpick candidates for presidential races.

Update: Let’s enter the Wayback Machine and recall this catch by Newsbusters from six months ago (via HA reader Pain Train):



GREGORY: First of all, you gave a speech in Georgia with language a lot of people think could be coded racially-tinged language, calling the president, the first black president, a food stamp president.

GINGRICH: Oh, come on, David.

GREGORY: What did you mean? What was the point?

REP. GINGRICH: That’s, that’s bizarre. That–this kind of automatic reference to racism, this is the president of the United States. The president of the United States has to be held accountable. Now, the idea that–and what I said is factually true. Forty-seven million Americans are on food stamps. One out of every six Americans is on food stamps. And to hide behind the charge of racism? I have–I have never said anything about President Obama which is racist.

Can someone please take the race card out of Gregory’s less-than-full deck, please?

Update II: Via an NBC News e-mail, David Gregory apologized for the comment on Twitter later:

“Wizard” remark this morning was a very poor choice of words. Did not mean to make that connection at all. Was not thinking. I apologize

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



To: chartseer who wrote (117327)11/9/2011 4:57:00 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224757
 
Coming to a USA near you soon... if obama gets all his wishes...

Government willing to use 'force' on homeschool kids
Threats come as options dwindle in fight over education
November 08, 2011
By Bob Unruh
wnd.com


German education officials say they are willing to use "force" as their options dwindle in a years-long fight against a homeschooling family, according to a report today from the Home School Legal Defense Association.


Jurgen and Rosemarie Dudek have been homeschooling their children in Germany for more than a decade, and for a good portion of that time have been battling in court with the government and its attempt to enforce a Nazi-era law requiring public school attendance.

The couple was sentenced to prison but but won an appeal and now is appealing a fine.

But the HSLDA, which has been active in supporting the family's homeschool efforts, reported today that a letter to the family threatens the use of force.

The letter to the parents from Hesse Regional School Office Director Anita Hoffman said the state may remedy its war against the family with a decision to "take custody of the children from the parents" or to "transport the children to school by force."

The family's religious and philosophical conviction that the children would be harmed by a German public school education has inspired others. Their story is being made into a documentary called "Building Education by Trusting God" by Woodcutter Film Studios.

The trailer for the coming project:
youtube.com


Jurgen Dudek told HSLDA it's the first time that the head of the school authorities herself sent the family a letter.

"I believe they're in a fix, not knowing exactly how to go on with our case," he said. "So they can only resort to putting all kinds of pressure on us, this time even threatening the forced transportation of our children to school."

The parents were given a retrial in 2009 in the dispute. It was then that 90-day jail sentences for each parent were overturned and replaced with fines, which now are on appeal.

The family's older son, who is finished with school and is apprenticed as a carpenter, earned a top score on a state educational exam. Still, authorities continue to press for the family to acquiesce to the state and put the other children in public school.



Some of the next generation of Dudeks


The HSLDA said Germany is one of the nations in which there is active persecution of homeschooling families. Last year a judge in the United States granted another homeschooling family asylum from Germany.

Another nation where similar crackdowns are under way is Sweden, where social services workers took custody of a 7-year-old boy in 2009 over homeschooling. He remains in the custody of the government, which now apparently is seeking to assume permanent control over him.

Parents in Germany are "fined thousands of dollars, threatened with jail time or the loss of custody of their children," the HSLDA reported. "Ironically, the highest German courts have ruled that homeschooling may be considered an abuse of parental rights and can be banned in the interest of 'stamping out parallel societies.'"

It was in 1937, when the German dictator, Adolf Hitler, said, "The youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled. This Reich stands, and it is building itself up for the future, upon its youth. And this new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing."

Wolfgang Drautz, consul general for the Federal Republic of Germany, commented previously on the issue, contending the government "has a legitimate interest in countering the rise of parallel societies that are based on religion."

As WND reported, Drautz emphasized the importance of schools teaching socialization, which was evident in the government's response when a German family in another case objected to police officers picking their child up at home and delivering him to a public school.

"The minister of education does not share your attitudes toward so-called homeschooling," said a government letter in response. "You complain about the forced school escort of primary school children by the responsible local police officers. ... In order to avoid this in future, the education authority is in conversation with the affected family in order to look for possibilities to bring the religious convictions of the family into line with the unalterable school attendance requirement."


But Michael Donnelly, the HSLDA's director of international relations, contends home education is a human right protected under international law and that Germany has gone astray.

"The German Constitution and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights recognize that the right of parents to direct a child's education is superior to that of the state. However, given the opportunity to protect this right in favor of home education, two of Germany's highest constitutional courts got it wrong. This gave 'cover' to lower courts, politicians and bureaucrats to persecute home educators," he said. "The Dudek case may provide an opportunity for the court to revisit its rulings in these cases."

He said the ultimate solution only would come when politicians in Germany decide to accept homeschooling.

"Germany is a federal republic, and its states control education, which means the real solution will come only when state-level German politicians step up and address this fundamental human rights issue," Donnelly said. "The number of homeschoolers is not large in Germany for obvious reason, but the failure of German politicians to act regarding this fundamental human rights concern speaks volumes about Germany's commitment to pluralism and democracy."

An attorney for the Dudeks, Andreas Vogt, is arguing that the Hesse district school law is too vague to permit criminal sanctions for those who homeschool, the HSLDA report said.

"I have the impression," Jurgen Dudek wrote to HSLDA, "that this is one of the last chances for German homeschoolers to appeal at the constitutional court in this matter, as the number of homeschoolers continues to dwindle due to the exodus of homeschooling families from Germany. And without any pressure from within, the state has no reason whatsoever to change its stance on homeschooling."

The level of vitriol in the government's fight has been high.

At their first hearing the Dudeks were fined, and then at a second hearing in 2008, they were ordered to serve three-month prison terms when a prosecutor declared he was unhappy with fines and wanted them in jail.

At a later hearing in 2009, however, a judge spared them the jail time and fined the couple $181, despite arguments from the prosecutor that only jail is a deterrent to homeschooling families.

The family from Archfield had been targeted by a prosecutor identified as Herwig Mueller, who asserted that jail is the only sufficient punishment for the family's "crime."

At the time of the first sentencing hearing, the prosecutor told the family, "You don't have to worry about the fine, because I will send you to jail."