Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Metaphysics and Spiritual Practices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jane Hafker who wrote (213)	11/20/1997 8:38:00 PM
From: Carol	Respond to of 650

Jane dear, I could have said, "please don't take your wagon, and go home, we will play the game your way" alas I didn't do that as I'm not into playing games, especially head games.. The playground is all yours.. (bowing out gracefully, no pun intended) Unlike you, I have no combat experience, so prefer to " make love" rather than to "make war". Is this a failing, I think not.... This will be our final communique..Have a good life.... Repectfully Carol

To: Jane Hafker who wrote (213)	11/20/1997 9:23:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker	Respond to of 650

Carol, I don't know you, but I guess I'm caertainly getting to. May I say this: In all my years I have had no situation where anyone on this earth or the outer heavens has come into my dealings with other people and translated my feelings and words to that person, as some sort of mediating go-between. You don't know me well enough to do it, and I sensed that this type of gestalt or whatever it is was right around the corner. That's the main reason I just wanted to continue to have fun with people who enjoy having fun with me on my e-mail, without the ranae contendus that does on here. I do not know who "we" is, but I most certainly hope that you do not presume to speak for 2 men who may or may not enjoy my verbal company as much as I enjoy theirs. I posted to you out of politeness, but it was time consuming, and made things worse, as now you judge again, and frankly, Carol, you just dont' even know what you're talking about. Our brains are from separate galaxies. Consider that I came here from the Pliades, and you don't speak Pliadian, and we will stay warm and mutual cyber acquaintances who will probably sometimes type things at the same place. But do not start wars with myself and 2 men I have come to care for, please. This is not polite, really it isn't, and both of the people in question are more than capable of sorting the idiom of my English. Please do refer to a lexicon, however, in that mind "game" is trite and boring and everybody does it. A mind-tripper is a much different breed. First of all, I know very few mind-trippers, and it comes from a time that is past, and that was one of the great pleasures of it, both in this century and years and years ago. Let's remain friends by agreeing that I will not jump into your conversations and explain them to people, and you will not do that to mine. I think that is polite behavior on both our parts, and I have nothing but very warm and fuzzy feelings for G-hunk and Muench. And God has put them there, so I feel you should leave it as it is.

To: Jane Hafker who wrote (213)	11/21/1997 12:34:00 AM
From: Harmattan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 650

Its feeling mighty claustrophobic in here. >>>And do you really speak to me, or do you just play to audiences?<<< I have plainly stated, I am shallow. Let me change that to I am shallow and vain and play to audiences. >>>More specifically, probably I didn't like being part, and party to, a public statement that someone would prefer to be a small greenish legume to associating with the Creator. That seems as foolish and unwise a statement for him to make as for me to type in capital letters how I challenge the minnions of darkness to come against me. In so doing, I step outside the rules which protect me from them in the first place. In so doing he takes his chances. But I was very taken aback by such an assault on the Lord's character, I guess. It surprised me, and it simply seemed time to leave. It is just that simple.<<< Who? What?...Me? Say what? I said that? You give me way to much credit for making meaningful statements. I assure you Jane, I was simply and affectionately poking fun at a weak wordplay on your nonword "Sonbeam" by in turn using the literary devices consonance and alliteration, "soybean". As for interpreting my preference to be a legume rather than your idiosyncratic version of follower of Christ as an "assult on the Lord's character" well, what can I say. We must truly differ in our knowledge of the (in Greek) "logos. You were only "part and party" to a defamation in your own thinking. I might add (jabbing in fun) in Greek the word beam is "dokos". I can only find five uses of it in the entire New Testament and in each case it is used to illustrate the moral "be careful in judging others". Now, to THAT I plead no contest. g(enuine)hunk