SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 9:54:01 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 224750
 
Look who’s behind Occupy Jew-hating.
...............................................................................................................
By Aaron Klein November 8, 2011
kleinonline.wnd.com

In the face of mounting charges of anti-Semitism at Occupy sites nationwide, several so-called Jewish groups have been attempting to spin the protest movement as Jew-friendly, as even representing Jewish ideals.

Most prominent among those groups is the Jewish Funds for Justice, or JFFJ, which is funded by billionaire George Soros.

A slew of other Soros-funded progressive groups are also behind the drive to deny Occupy contains significant anti-Semitic elements.

KleinOnline found JFFJ is led by individuals associated with communist and socialist groups; the children of Soviet spies; and a U.S. socialist organization that seeks to infiltrate the Democratic Party.

JFFJ has been widely quoted in the news media in recent weeks portraying the Occupy movement as representing Jewish values.

JFFJ activists reportedly led high-holiday services at New York, Boston and Los Angeles Occupy sites, including prayers for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. The group helped erect sukkot, or customary temporary booths,at Occupy sites during the Feast of Tabernacles.

An article in the San Francisco Sentinel, entitled ”Occupy Wall Street Movement brings Jewish ethos to demonstrations,” quoted Regina Weiss, JFFJ’s communications director, stating of the movement: “For many of us, social justice is where we find our Judaism.”

“For many there is no more important way to stand up and express Judaism on the holiest night of the year than to stand with people who are hurting and to stand up for greater equality in the country,” Weiss said of Occupy’s Yom Kippur services.

Elissa Barrett, chief of regional operations for the JFFJ and its partner, the Progressive Jewish Alliance, explained how a sukkah espouses Occupy ideals.

“I think of a sukkah as a structure that’s full of vulnerability,” Berrett said in a widely-circulated article published by a Jewish syndication service. “It forces us to look at what’s happening in the world around us.”

Aryeh Cohen,a JFFJ board member who serves as associate professor of Rabbinic Literature at the American Jewish University, wrote an opinion piece for the Soros-funded Center for American Progress glorifying the anti-Wall Street protests while arguing the movement expresses Torah values.

“The just society that emerges from a reading of the classic canon of Rabbinic literature, is what I call a ‘community of obligation.’ Residency in a city is determined by the assumptions of the obligations of the city,” Cohen wrote at Think Progress, a project of the Center for American Progress.

“So for now, my humble shout out to the holy community in Liberty Square, New York, hoist a sign for me which reads: So follow the way of the good, And keep to the paths of the just,” Cohen wrote.

Just last week, a coalition of 15 progressive Jewish activists, former politicians and union leaders released a statement denouncing opponents of Occupy Wall Street for accusing the movement of anti-Semitism.

“We are publicly engaged American Jews who support both Israel and the ideas behind Occupy Wall Street, and who also strongly oppose right-wing attempts to smear that movement with false charges of anti-Semitism,” the statement said.

The letter was signed by Jeremy Ben Ami, founder of the Soros-funded J Street; former SEIU President Andy Stern; and Hadar Susskin, Vice President of the Soros-funded Tides Center.

Those groups have deep ties to the Occupy movement.

As KleinOnline was first to report, the tactic of blocking bridges, already used by Occupy Wall Street to hold up the Brooklyn Bridge last month, was institutionalized by Stephen Lerner, a controversial anti-capitalist SEIU organizer.

The Tides Center, meanwhile, funds Adbusters magazine, which is reported to have come up with the Occupy Wall Street idea after “Arab Spring” protests toppled governments in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia.

Tides marketing partner is Fenton Communication, which reportedly represented Occupy’s march part millionaires homes last month. J Street’s Ben Ami formerly worked for Fenton.

‘Extreme anti-Semitic, anti-Israel comments’

Videos of anti-Semitic sentiment at nationwide Occupy sites have gone viral on the Internet while protesters have been quoted blaming Jews for corruption on Wall Street. The movement, however, argues this sentiment is fringe and does not represent Occupy ideology.

In one video, released by the Emergency Committee for Israel, demonstrators were on caught film stating, “Jews control Wall Street” and “You can’t even speak English? You Israeli? Go back to Israel.”

The conservative blog ReasonTV posted a clip of a protester at Occupy Los Angeles stating, “I think the Zionist Jews who are running these big banks and our Federal Reserve… need to be run out of this country.”

Scores of other images have been circulated on YouTube.

The sentiment prompted the Republican National Committee to attack Democrats last month for failing to speak out against what RNC communications director Sean Spicer charecterized as “extreme anti-Semitic, anti-Israel comments” reported at the Occupy Wall Street protests.

Spicer blasted top Democrats for voicing their support for the demonstrations even as some of the protesters, he claimed, made “anti-Semitic, anti-Israel comments.”

Still, the Anti-Defamation League released a statement, saying, “There is no evidence that these incidents are widespread.”

The ADL noted “anti-Semitism has not gained traction more broadly with the protestors, nor is it representative of the larger movement at this time.”

Soros’ Jews

JFJ,meanwhile, is funded by Soros’ Open Society Institute.

In 2009, Open Society provided a $150,000 grant to the JFJ and its associated group, the Funder’s Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

Last year, Open Society provided a $200,000 grant to last a period of two years. Now it has emerged that the group is led by an assortment of radicals.

JFJ was founded by Si Khan, who serves on the board of the Rosenberg Fund for Children, which seeks to aid the children of parents the group deems “targeted, progressive activists.”

“We also assist youth who themselves have been targeted as a result of their progressive activities.”

The group was founded by Robert Meeropol, whose parents Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were accused of passing crucial nuclear secrets to the Soviets and executed in 1953.

JFJ board member Amy Dean, meanwhile has keynoted a Communist Party event and was involved with a U.S. socialist party.

She keynoted the Chicago Communist Party USA’s 22nd Annual People’s World Banquet, which took place last December at a local restaurant. At the event, CPUSA labor secretary Scott Marshall deemed Dean’s work visionary and innovative.

Dean reportedly used the address to call for “much more” to be done “to build up the movement to ensure the Obama agenda and progressive change is advanced in Congress.”

In November, Dean keynoted the seventh annual Working Class Media & Democracy Forum in St. Louis, which the New Zeal blog reports was arranged by Communist Party member Tony Pecinovsky.

Dean also was involved with the New Party, a controversial 1990s political party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

KleinOnline previously reported on evidence from the party’s own newsletter listing President Obama a member of the New Party.

Also, Marxist activist Carl Davidson recalled in a KleinOnline interview that Obama participated in the New Party. He affirmed that Obama’s views overlapped with those of his party.

JFJ board member Janice Fine was also New Party leader and a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, another socialist group.

JFJ board member Donna Katzin is a former activist with the Cuba Resource Center.

New Zeal reported she is a donor to the Oakland, Calif.-based DataCenter, which itself has close ties to Cuba.

JFJ’s president and CEO, Simon Greer, previously worked as a labor and community organizer and social change leader for 15 years.

Greer recently wrote that he has had the “privilege of getting to know George Soros. During our conversations, he made it clear that his experience surviving the Holocaust seared a simple but profound truth in his brain.”

KleinOnline reported JFJ runs a Selah Leadership Program, which provides community organizing training to local leaders. As of mid-2007, more than 200 leaders from 165 organizations had gone through the program.

Past participants include Heather Booth, founder of the radical Midwest Academy, which teaches the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky.

KleinOnline was first to report that the Woods Fund, a Chicago nonprofit on which Barack Obama served as paid director alongside Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, provided money to Midwest Academy.

KleinOnline also broke the story that the executive director of Midwest Academy was part of the team that developed and delivered a group of volunteers for Obama’s 2008 campaign.

Another past participant in JFJ’s training program is Working Families Party Executive Director Dan Cantor.

“Red Army: The Radical Network that must be defeated to save America” exposes the extremists behind Occupy Wall Street along with the radical socialist network that seized political power in Washington over decades, shaped Obama’s presidential agenda and threatens the very future of the U.S.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 11:16:14 AM
From: joefromspringfield8 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224750
 
OK Ken. Lets look at the whole picture. Here is what bothers me.

Over the past 12 months, payroll employment has increased by an average of 125,000 per month.

bls.gov

In an article on the June employment report the NYT told readers that the economy needs 150,000 jobs per month to keep pace with the growth in the population.

First time unemployment claims are averaging about 400,000 a week. That doesn't sound good to me.

dol.gov





To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 11:21:08 AM
From: Carolyn4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
I would hire this guy. Would you?

youtube.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 3:14:26 PM
From: Hope Praytochange3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 3:16:58 PM
From: Hope Praytochange3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Sticking Our Head In Tar Sands Posted 11/11/2011 06:28 PM ET

Energy Policy: The administration plans to study rerouting the Keystone XL pipeline until after next year's election, delaying needed jobs and energy. By that time, Canada's oil will be on its way to China.

That the American people are merely human sacrifices on the altar of environmentalism is seen by Thursday's announcement by the State Department that it has caved in to greenie demands that the Keystone XL pipeline intended to bring Canadian tar sands oil to the American market be rerouted around an aquifer that supplies water to eight states.

The process will take at least a year, kicking the oil can down the road past the November 2012 election. It is our fear that if President Obama is re-elected, the project will be scuttled permanently. That may be a moot point because as we have noted Canada is quite ready to run a pipeline to its West Coast and send its tar sands oil to an energy-hungry China.

Political considerations weighed heavily in the decision by an administration in which re-election trumps everything else, whether it be rising energy prices or the need for jobs. Environmentalists had warned the administration they might find other things to do in 2012 if Keystone XL was approved.

"This is not just about LCV (League of Conservation Voters), which spent nearly $1 million to help elect Obama in 2008, or any other group that engages in electoral politics in the upcoming election," said Tiernan Sittenfeld, the league's senior vice president for government affairs, in a not-so-veiled threat.

"It's about people out there who care deeply about the environment, how much they volunteer, how many doors they knock on, how much they contribute directly," Sittenfeld added. "We have LCV supporters who maxed out in the Obama campaign in 2008 who have told us they are not going to give this time around if the president approves this pipeline."

Ironically, a number of unions, a major part of the Democratic base, are backing the project, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Union of Operating Engineers, the Teamsters, the Laborers' International Union, the Building & Construction Trades Department of the AFL-CIO, and the United Association of Plumbers & Pipe Fitters for the U.S. and Canada. They want the jobs.

The Keystone XL pipeline would carry as much as 700,000 barrels of oil a day, doubling the capacity of an existing pipeline operated by TransCanada in the upper Midwest. The 36-inch pipeline carrying oil derived from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, to Gulf Coast refineries would create about 20,000 construction and manufacturing jobs, union jobs, that will increase the personal income of American workers by $6.5 billion.

According to the Energy Policy Research Foundation, TransCanada "is looking to expand the Keystone XL capability by offering Bakken oil producers located in Montana and North Dakota a chance to link into the pipeline and send their crude to the Gulf Coast refineries for the first time."

Joe Oliver, Canada's natural resource minister, recently told Reuters that if the pipeline wasn't approved "we'll simply have to intensify our efforts to sell the oil elsewhere."

That elsewhere is China. As we have noted, Sinopec, a Chinese state-controlled oil company, has a stake in a $5.5 billion plan to build the Northern Gateway Pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific Coast province of British Columbia.

Environmentalists say the pipeline would endanger the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska and other states along the route. Yet they ignore the fact that 50,000 miles of pipeline already crisscrosses the U.S., including Nebraska. The technology is neither new nor unsafe. One of these is the Keystone 1 pipeline, which already carries crude from the oil sands.

America needs reliable energy and jobs. President Obama needs campaign donations and foot soldiers.

Unfortunately, he has once again chosen self-interest over the national interest.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/12/2011 3:49:38 PM
From: lorne6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Banner over San Diego calls for impeachment
Hired pilot told by tower message triggered flood of calls
November 11, 2011
wnd.com


San Diego's own Impeach Obama Tea Party has joined forces with the city's Stop Obama Now!! – San Diego and a flying banner company to call for the removal of Barack Obama from office.

The stunning stunt, flying a banner overhead just hours before Obama was expected to visit the USS Carl Vinson to watch a college basketball game scheduled on its deck, rattled more than a few individuals, as the pilot for the banner company reported the tower told him to "depart the area," because there were "a lot of telephone calls" coming in.

National Sky Ads, which flew the banner, reported to WND, "Our pilot was told to move even though we were not in restricted air space."

The impeachment clause in the U.S. Constitution, and what it means: All here in "The Case for Imipeachment."

The company added, "We circled North Island until the tower moved us out due to phone calls."

The banner:



The event was scheduled to coincide with announced plans for Obama to attend the Carrier Classic game on the deck of Carl Vinson in San Diego Bay. Those plans were announced earlier this week.

The banner said, "Impeach Obama" and then included an announcement for a 3 p.m. protest at North Island.

North Island, the sponsors explained, is short for North Island Naval Air Station. The banner was dispatched to fly directly over San Diego and cover all of the major highways for Veterans Day.

Roger Ogden, an organizer for "Stop Obama Now!!" said his group and an estimated 8,000 members of the "Impeach Obama Tea Party" on Facebook joined for the project.

Volunteers are contributing donations from $5 up to pay for the project.


The banner


"Some of the participants are also from several other local patriot groups," he said. "The participants voice many reasons why Obama should not be in office. In general, people believe that he is not a loyal American and was not fit or qualified to become president in the first place and that he has committed many acts, while in office, to confirm that opinion. Participants are also outraged that the news media has glossed over many troubling facts about his background and unconstitutional actions while in office."

He said, "Conservatives, by nature, do not like to be rebellious or confrontational and I have been looking for new ways for my members to speak out that may be more suited to their demeanor and which are not controlled by the corporate media. Sky banners are a good way to get a short message out to many people."

He said he hopes "America will grasp this message … We don't want it to be partisan … because it's not about party politics. It's about him being eligible for the office of president."

Organizers said they did not intend for Obama to see the message, because air space in the area always is closed down before Air Force One descends, but their hope was that other people would see it and it would create a conversation.

There are two driving forces pushing the impeach Obama effort: the concept that as the Constitution requires presidents to be a "natural born citizen" and as Obama's father never was a citizen he doesn't meet the definition from the U.S. Supreme Court that that would be a person born of two citizen parents in the country.

The other force is the myriad moves he's made in the White House, from taking over private corporations to spending trillions of dollars more than the budget allocated to bowing to Islamic leaders to maneuvering to threaten constitutional rights such as that protected by the 2nd Amendment.

Past efforts to take Obama to court over the eligibility dispute have proven unsuccessful, although Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio currently has a Cold Case Posse investigating the possibility that Obama will use a fraudulent document to try to qualify for the state's ballot in 2012.

There also are several lawsuits pending that challenge Obama's eligibility, but the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has refused to even consider the question of law at hand – whether Obama is eligible. One justice admitted the judges were avoiding the issue.

And there have been revelations that Obama supporters tried to change the requirement that a president be a natural-born citizen legislatively before Obama's ascent to power, strongly suggesting a knowledge of a potential problem years ago.

Despite the stonewalling by official channels, a scientific survey showed fully half of Americans want Congress to investigate.

There have been other calls for Obama to be removed.

Former Congressman Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., wrote in a WND column: "The number of the president's actions that arguably qualify as impeachable offenses is staggering. The question before the country is what to do about it.

"It is time for the House of Representatives to take its constitutional responsibility seriously and launch an impeachment investigation. The investigative committee should hold hearings, collect and weigh the evidence, and then present its findings to the Congress and the nation. "

He cited individual violations on which Obama, if found guilty, should be removed.

The first statement from a member of Congress on the issue of impeachment came from U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., who responded to this question from Think Progress: "I know Newt Gingrich has came out (sic) and said if they don't reverse course [regarding trials for terror suspects] here, we ought to be talking about possibly impeaching either Attorney General [Eric] Holder or even President Obama to try to get them to reverse course. Do you think that is something you would support?"

Franks replied: "If it could gain the collective support, absolutely. I called for Eric Holder to repudiate the policy to try terrorists within our civil courts, or resign. So it just seems like that they have an uncanny ability to get it wrong on almost all fronts."




WND also has reported that Jonathan Chait at The New Republic, before the 2010 election, predicted that the House would impeach Obama, but he wouldn't be removed from office because that would require 67 votes in the Senate.

"Hear me now and believe me later. ... They won't do it right away. And they won't succeed in removing Obama. (You need 67 Senate votes.) But if Obama wins a second term, the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office," Chait wrote.

In his explanation of why he believed an impeachment could be forthcoming, Chait says the reason itself won't matter.

"Wait, you say. What will they impeach him over? You can always find something. Mini-scandals break out regularly in Washington. Last spring, the political press erupted in a frenzy over the news that the White House had floated a potential job to prospective Senate candidate Joe Sestak. On a scale of one to 100, with one representing presidential jaywalking and 100 representing Watergate, the Sestak job offer probably rated about a 1.5. Yet it was enough that GOP Representative Darrell Issa called the incident an impeachable offense," Chait wrote.

WND also reported when Maj. Gen. Jerry Curry, who served in Vietnam and commanded the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground during his long military career, said Congress should simply hand Obama an ultimatum.

"Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House," he said. "They should serve notice on him and say, 'Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You're under a cloud of suspicion. We can't continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.'"

He was answering questions on Stan Solomon's "Talk to Solomon" show:



Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation.

"I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said.

Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute, wrote, "President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached."

Kuhner continued, "He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go."

Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a WND column, discussed the ImpeachObamaCampaign.com they launched.

And at the Taking America Back 2010 conference in Miami in September 2010, Floyd Brown expanded on the idea.

Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism, said, "The Obama presidency is a disease. … Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it's Obama's hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now.

"Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray," Brown added. "He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he's doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he's taking us.

"Barack Obama is a very dangerous man," said Brown. "Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup."




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/13/2011 10:52:31 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224750
 
I tried to help some friends with their property tax appeal. They bought their house in 2010 for $214,000. It was assessed that same year for $330,000. I thought this should be easy; common sense says it's worth what they paid for it, right? Wrong. The appeal failed. According to the assessor, the house is worth $116,000 more than what they paid for it! It also doesn't matter that it was listed with a Realtor for months before they purchased it, which proves it's not a discounted price to nephew Pierre.

No, the fly in the ointment here is the fact that they bought it from a bank and banks sell properties via bargain and sale deeds. According to the Assessor's Office, they don't recognize those types of deeds because the Washington Department of Revenue forbids them from considering bargain percent sale deeds in their tax evaluation of property. I called the Washington Department of Revenue and they told me that is incorrect. They said the decision to use bargain and sale deeds is up to the assessor for that county. The people within the assessor's are working within rules and guidelines handed down from the administrative level. I think this just another way to raise taxes without having to go through the normal approval method. Do you have this kind of problem in your area?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/13/2011 11:04:34 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224750
 
Odumbama votes 'present' on oil pipeline



President Obama faced a tough political decision this week on the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada. He could order the State Department to approve it, thus alienating his environmental activist supporters, or he could kill the pipeline, thus angering his union allies.

Obama chose to do what he had done 130 times while he was in the Illinois state Senate. He voted present.

The State Department announced Thursday that it would begin developing a second, redundant environmental impact statement for the 1,700-mile pipeline that traverses six states on its route from Alberta, Canada, to Houston, Texas. This buys Obama time well past November 2012. The first environmental assessment, three years in the works, was completed in August. This second assessment will take at least as long the first.

Environmentalists could care less about Nebraskan drinking water, which is the excuse for this delay. There are already almost 21,000 miles of oil and natural gas pipelines crisscrossing Nebraska. Activists want to kill the Keystone XL pipeline because the oil it will be carrying across Nebraska, and five other states, comes from tar sands, which they believe contributes more to global warming than other energy sources.

Unions support the pipeline because it will create jobs immediately. It would be completely privately funded. TransCanada, the Canadian company behind the pipeline, says it will spend $7 billion building the pipeline in the United States. A Canadian Energy Research Institute found that this private infrastructure spending could create as many as 435,000 jobs in the U.S. by 2035.

This is not the first time the Obama administration has punted when confronted with a potential wedge issue. In September, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it were rescinding proposed ozone regulations that even the EPA conceded would cost the U.S. economy $90 billion annually. In early October, the EPA announced it would not be releasing scheduled particulate matter regulations that farmers worried would cost them billions. Also in October, the EPA announced it would be easing previously issued regulations on cross-state emissions from power plants.

Through the end of last month, Obama had already imposed 214 new regulations with price tags higher than $100 million each, more than any past president. But worse, there is an even larger number of regulations that have been authorized by Congress but not yet written by the federal agencies. A final regulation may be expensive, but at least a business owner can plan around it. An expected but unwritten rule only freezes business in place.


http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2011/11/obama-votes-present-oil-pipeline#ixzz1dazEz3lS



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (117499)11/13/2011 11:18:25 AM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
1,066 MF Global Employees Laid Off; CME Pledges Backing for Customers By MICHAEL J. DE LA MERCED and BEN PROTESS
The CME Group, the exchange where MF Global did most of its business, has taken the unusual step of pledging $300 million to the bankruptcy trustee to help the firm’s beleaguered customers.