To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (3435 ) 11/20/1997 5:06:00 PM From: SOROS Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10786
Dear Jeffrey, Of course CSGI will act on them with ESP. Everyone associated with that company (especially those paid to hype it) has ESP (extra small .....), and they are proud of it. I hear all they serve in the company lunch room is beans and weenies. On a more serious note -- does this ending of their press release sound like a company with a "magic", fully-automated tool that makes "no errors" as has been claimed by our resident ESP expert? ******** "Factors which might cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained herein include the following: failure of the company's ConSyGen 2000 or ConSyGen Conversion toolsets to enable the company to convert software programs successfully so that they are Year 2000 compliant and migrated to a functionally equivalent operation; setbacks in developing the ConSyGen 2000 or ConSyGen Conversion toolsets or the company's other software products; market acceptance of the company's products; competitive factors; technical obsolescence of the company's products; and the ability of the company to protect its proprietary information." ************** From this statement, I would form the following conclusions: 1. They are not convinced the tool even works, much less it has no errors. 2. Their tool is not even finished developing yet. Ah, that explains why they all have ESP! 3. Even if they go through puberty and are happy with their tool's size and functionality, they are still uncertain that other's tools (i.e. ALYD,) will not work faster and better, and because of this, no companies will let them even touch their girlfriend's code, let alone try to make it compliant. 4. They're not even sure they can protect their tool from being used by the cook in their lunch room. I remain, SOROS