SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve leftwich who wrote (1410)11/20/1997 2:00:00 PM
From: Paul Dubsky  Respond to of 27311
 
As FMK indicated, 7% does not mean a sell-out by the CEO. Also, "registering" to sell is not the same as selling. In some cases, I see the actual trade date as being earlier than the regs date, and in others, after the regs date. Anyhow, the key is that he still owns 350,000. If this was a company in decline, he would have sold A LOT more!

I'm only upset at myself for getting fully invested too early. This is undoubtedly a buying opportunity on MM manipulation. There are no doubt many investors with stop loss orders on VLNC. Also, the hold at $7 has so far proved key. If it holds there for several days/weeks, we'll be ok. If it breaks down, then $6 or $6.5 could be in the works.

Good luck, and don't be fazed, if you believe!



To: steve leftwich who wrote (1410)11/20/1997 2:06:00 PM
From: John Curtis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Steve: Remember that registering to sell doesn't mean that he'll necessarily exercise that "option" quickly. Cal may merely be serving notice that he intends, at some future point, to sell shares. As for today's action, I've seen nothing to alter my bullish position on VLNC, and am using this weakness to add to my position. As I said earlier, manna from heaven. However, I've given some thought to what's been said here recently regarding the small float, majority of shares being in relatively few hands(ie 800 share holders) and I began to think about what would be most likely to happen should the "big boys" want in. The most logical conclusion would be to have the MM's start driving the Bid down in an attempt to garner as many cheap shares as possible. If this is the case then anyone who has employed a stop loss mechanism is "showing their cards" to the MM's who can see those stop losses. All else being equal, they'll move the bid down and take out those stop losses. Of course, panick could set in, a dream scenario from a MM standpoint, causing folks on margin to sell(or forced to sell) driving more shares out of one set of hands and into the MM's.

Of course, this assumes nothing has changed within the confines of VLNC. If nothing fundamental has changed the one possible way of determining the validity of my above hypothesis is to determine who's sitting on the bid? Can anyone with a level 2 machine answer that question? Also, who are the MM's for VLNC? I know Donalson Jenrette(spelling?) is one, but there must be others. I recommend everyone stay calm, don't panick and use this opportunity to add more, if you've the stress tolerance to gamble.

Meanwhile, for those who may think MM's don't ever do the above, I'm willing to share with you a report I pulled down off the Forbes website some time back that discusses how MM's, etc., do in fact manipulate things to their own ends. It should be required reading for all people who wish to play in the market. Drop me a e-mail if you'd like a copy, I'll be more than happy to oblige!!

Regards!

John~