Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (27848)	11/20/1997 2:23:00 PM
From: Alan Vennix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Ron and all, Sure a relief to see this thread used for the valid exchange of information and questions and not all the cr*p that was choking it these past days. Alan

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (27848)	11/20/1997 2:27:00 PM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

Re: Answers Thanks for the prompt reply, Ron. Pý

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (27848)	11/20/1997 2:38:00 PM
From: knight	Respond to of 35569

Ron, Timewise, what kind of a set-back is this latest release; 6 months, 1 year? knight

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (27848)	11/21/1997 10:42:00 AM
From: BobS	Respond to of 35569

Ron, << The rest here is just my opinion, but I believe IPM wanted to have a verified fire assay before releasing news on their FA work. These assays are very related work so I don't think there is a problem in how this and the timeliness of it was disclosed. >> You use the phrase "verified fire assay". I have not read any publicly released documents from IPM that state the fire assay used by the Arizona Registered Laboratory has been verified - not by B-D, not by Bateman. Maybe by the Lab itself, but I'm not sure if that means as much as getting verification by B-D or Bateman. The 11/14/97 PR does state "Independent verification by the modified fire assay....confirms gold and silver.....". This does not say the MFA has been verified by either of IPM's mining consultants. It is stating that the assay results in the table are verified by the MFA. Just wanted to clarify..... If I have missed something in my research of IPM, and there is a publicly released document that states the MFA has been verified by B-D or Bateman, I'd be happy if you could point it out to me. This is, after all, one of the key tasks B-D had been working on. Thanks. bobs.