To: bart13 who wrote (83670 ) 11/26/2011 3:54:40 AM From: Maurice Winn 2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) | Respond to Cool, the last word, thank you for that. My position is simply reality. Can't get more robust than that. 400 years of solar activity is a pretty good record with a 10 year cycle. 2020 is the test, coming right up. Just as with tsunamis, volcanoes, earthquakes, CO2 and whatnot, I position myself to have a low probability of harm if what I expect to happen happens, while not incurring costs in case what might happen doesn't. It has been a highly successful strategy. I have bought a house on the top of landslide country, a concrete house with chimneys in an earthquake zone, houses in volcanic land, a house on the coastline - got away with it each time, because each one was out of reach of harm, and I made it so [near enough for the probabilities].
