Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (83751)	11/29/2011 8:47:40 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218534

Protesters Storm British Embassy in Tehran chanting “death to England,” tearing down a British flag and ransacking offices, news reports said. They also chanted: “The embassy of Britain should be taken over.” The episode was shown live on Iranian state television. The invaders threw stones at windows, and one was seen climbing over the high wall around the compound with an apparently looted portrait of Queen Elizabeth II. While some reports said the protesters clashed with riot police, other accounts said the authorities did nothing to prevent the attack. While a small group of people entered the embassy, hundreds more gathered outside demanding the immediate departure of the British ambassador. Protesters Storm British Embassy in Tehran By ALAN COWELL and RICK GLADSTONE LONDON — In the latest sign of deteriorating relations with the West, around 20 Iranian protesters entered the British Embassy compound in Tehran on Tuesday, chanting “death to England,” tearing down a British flag and ransacking offices, news reports said. The episode came a day after Iran enacted legislation to downgrade relations with Britain in retaliation for intensified sanctions imposed by Western nations last week to punish the Iranians for their suspect nuclear development program. Britain promised to respond “robustly.” The British Foreign Office in London said it was “aware of the reports” from Tehran about its embassy on Tuesday, but declined to comment further. There was no immediate word on the whereabouts of the embassy staff. The Associated Press identified the intruders as hard-line Iranian students, who were said to have burst into the building and thrown documents from windows. They also chanted: “The embassy of Britain should be taken over.” The episode was shown live on Iranian state television. The invaders threw stones at windows, and one was seen climbing over the high wall around the compound with an apparently looted portrait of Queen Elizabeth II. While some reports said the protesters clashed with riot police, other accounts said the authorities did nothing to prevent the attack. While a small group of people entered the embassy, hundreds more gathered outside demanding the immediate departure of the British ambassador. It was not immediately clear if the episode was supposed to mirror the storming of the American Embassy in 1979 that led to the enduring breach in diplomatic relations with Washington. The moves against Britain’s diplomatic representation followed action on Monday by the Guardian Council, an Iranian clerical body that has oversight on bills passed by Parliament, which unanimously endorsed a bill approved on Sunday to expel the ambassador and reduce diplomatic contacts, Iranian news agencies reported. The council determined that the legislation was “not in violation of Islamic principles or articles of the Iranian Constitution,” the Fars News Agency quoted a council spokesman as saying. The United States and the European Union imposed harsher sanctions on Iran on Nov. 21 after the United Nations’s nuclear monitoring agency released a report on Nov. 8 that said Iran might be working on a nuclear weapon and missile delivery system. Iran has denied those accusations and insists that its nuclear program is peaceful. It has called the United Nations report a false and shameful propaganda display done at the behest of the United States and its allies. The sanctions imposed by Britain were considered the most severe because they required that all contacts with the Iranian Central Bank be severed, a step that other countries, including the United States, did not take. Iranian lawmakers had signaled last week that they would move quickly to downgrade diplomatic ties with Britain. The Foreign Office in London responded to the passage of the bill on Sunday by calling the action “regrettable.” On Monday, William Hague, Britain’s foreign secretary, told British lawmakers that “if the Iranian government confirms its intention to act on this, we shall respond robustly in consultation with our international partners,” news agencies reported from London. The Guardian Council’s speedy approval of the measure cleared the way for it to have the force of law and reflected Iran’s deepening anger over the sanctions. Under the terms, Britain’s ambassador, Dominick John Chilcott, must leave Tehran within two weeks, according to a report on the legislation by Press TV, a state-run English-language news site in Iran. Iranian anger at the West was also evident in news reports on Monday that Iran’s foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, had been forced to cancel a trip to The Hague because Hungary had refused permission for his aircraft to cross its airspace. It was not immediately clear why Hungary had taken such a step. Mr. Salehi is not on a list of Iranian officials who are banned from travel to the European Union under the current sanctions. Iran state television said the Hungarian ambassador had been asked for an explanation. Mr. Salehi had planned to attend a United Nations conference on the prohibition of chemical weapons. Concern that Iran may be close to producing a nuclear weapon has grown since the release of the United Nations report, particularly in Israel, which considers Iran its most dangerous enemy. Iranian warnings to Israel against trying a pre-emptive military strike on Iran’s nuclear installations have also escalated in recent weeks. The heightened sensitivities to the possibility of such a strike were apparent on Monday when a few Iranian news agencies reported on a suspected explosion near the central city of Isfahan, where the Iranians process uranium. The accounts of a blast being heard in the city were skimpy and contradictory, but that did not stop the Israeli news media from leading their evening broadcasts with the news. It was also the top item on the Web site of Haaretz, a major Israeli newspaper, with the headline “Report: Explosion rocks Iran city of Isfahan, home to key nuclear facility.” Alan Cowell reported from London, and Rick Gladstone from New York. Artin Afkhami contributed reporting from Boston.