Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (20520)	11/20/1997 3:14:00 PM
From: Randy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

DD,would you please refer me to the rule on inside information that your inferrences are based on?TIA,Randy

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (20520)	11/20/1997 3:18:00 PM
From: campe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The $5M cash + $5M loan = $10M was also announced by Steve Hursey after a phone conversation last week with RMIL. So it looks like if folks call and ask the right questions, in the right manner, info can be gotten prior to company making news release. techstocks.com

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (20520)	11/20/1997 3:18:00 PM
From: Prop	Respond to of 55532

True, the vehicle is important. How it was passed is important. However, there is also the criteria that a recipient has to actually make a purchase based upon that information. Once it was posted it became merely an as yet unsubstantiated rumor, so anyone reading it and acting has no liability. Now whether the source that passed the information to Riley was inside or merely an overheard discussion in a restaurant or whether Riley actually purchased based solely on this information we do not know. It may have been passed to Riley by another party, unassociated with the companies, who presented it as a 'possibility' as well. Of course, I am definitely not a lawyer or expert on SEC Regulations, therefore could very easily be outdated or ignorant about the present requirements to substantiate this kind of claim. However, I don't feel too off base believing the "private" documents posted by mawork1 and the blatantly false press release posted by Puhrty constitute illegal acts. prop OH where oh where has my AAARRREEETTT gone. Oh where...