SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (83861)11/30/2011 12:19:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217656
 
That is excellent

What isn't spent in Arabia can better be spent in shanghai



To: KyrosL who wrote (83861)11/30/2011 7:21:36 AM
From: wallshot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217656
 
Interesting stuff that doesn't quite make sense to what is spoon fed via media. I was thinking somehow this means industrial consumption a.k.a. plastics, chemicals, etc must have dropped, significantly, relative to consumer consumption of oil.

This aligns with the first useful comment I saw on the article..." Franklin Van Voorhees wrote:This is actually a very bad sign for the state of the US economy. Over periods of less than 10 years, productive economic activity is directly proportional to energy consumption. If you look carefully at the EIA information, US petroleum production is well off its highs in the 1970s and 1980s, but consumption has fallen even more drastically since 2005. This is solid evidence that the productive economy never recovered from the last recession."



To: KyrosL who wrote (83861)11/30/2011 9:52:00 AM
From: bart13  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217656
 
Note that its "petroleum products", and carefully doesn't mention crude oil.... not that it doesn't contain some good news... and also exposes how poor GDP etc. really is.