Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (61275)	11/30/2011 10:36:18 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	1 Recommendation Respond to of 103300

Occupy Irrelevance: Is Movement Already Fizzling Out? On Oct. 5, just 18 days after the Occupy Wall Street movement got started, NBC news anchor Brian Williams declared that it had "spread steadily and far beyond Wall Street, and it could well turn out to be the protest of this current era." About a month later, Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs wrote in the New York Times that the Occupy movement was "most likely the start of a new era in America," adding that "those who think that the cold weather will end the protests should think again." Countless other pundits and advocates claimed more or less the same — that Occupy Wall Street was a grass-roots movement equal to if not potentially more influential than the Tea Party. But two months after it began, the movement is giving every sign of running out of steam. Recent protests have been resounding flops, public support is slipping, and even Democrats are reluctant to embrace the movement. Some recent Occupy failures: Black Friday Protest. Occupy Black Friday planned to dampen sales at publicly traded retailers on the biggest shopping day of the year to "hit corporations that corrupt and control American politics where it hurts." It was a bust. Just four showed up that morning at a New York City Macy's, for example, and only two dozen protested at downtown San Francisco stores. Meanwhile, Black Friday sales climbed 7% to a record high and the S&P Retail Index on Monday had its best one-day percentage gain since August. UC Davis Strike. Occupiers promised a general strike at the University of California-Davis Monday to protest tuition hikes, with the goal of shutting down the campus. The strike never happened, and classes went on as scheduled. Shutting Wall Street. Movement organizers planned a massive "street carnival" on its two-month anniversary Nov. 17, promising at least 10,000 would attend and "shut down Wall Street." Only about 1,000 showed up and Wall Street business went on as usual. Other "day of action" events around the country attracted only a small number of protesters. Student Debt Campaign. The Occupy Student Debt campaign is trying to enlist one million people to default on their student loans to protest the rising cost of colleges. So far, just over 1,700 have signed the online pledge, according to its website. With city governments clearing out many Occupy camps, including Occupy LA early Wednesday morning, it's now unclear if the movement will have any meaningful presence at all in the near future. In contrast, two months after the first Tea Party rallies, the movement managed to organize hundreds of protests across the country in April 2009 that attracted some 300,000 people. Other signs the Occupy movement is failing to catch fire: Occupy Wall Street's Facebook page has just 345,000 "likes," less than half the 853,000 who've "liked" the Tea Party Patriots page. Occupy Wall Street also been unable to attract the support of minority groups hurt most by the economic downturn. Blacks comprise a mere 1.6% of the movement, according to a Fast Company survey. And public support for the Occupy movement has started to fade. A recent survey by the liberal-leaning Public Policy Polling found just 33% now support the movement, dropping below the share who say they support the Tea Party. (Polls also show support for the Tea Party ebbing.) The latest Gallup survey found just over a third of Democrats back the Occupiers. Occupy supporters argue that, despite such setbacks, the movement has been effective in changing the terms of the public debate. " Income inequality is now a top-tier issue," according to Washington Post liberal blogger Ezra Klein. But the evidence of this rests mainly with the recent rise in news stories mentioning income inequality. That could simply be a reflection of media bias in favor of the Occupy cause, something the conservative Media Research Center has been documenting. In any case, income inequality is hardly a new issue, particularly among Democrats, who've campaigned on it for for decades. President Obama, for example, promised in 2008 to reverse Republican "trickle down" policies with those that would produce "bottom up" prosperity. But the biggest roadblock for the Occupy movement may be the public's views on the matter. In a Pew Research survey, 58% say it's more important for people to "have freedom to pursue life's goals without state interference," while with just 35% prioritizing the government's guaranteeing "nobody is in need." A survey by the Economic Mobility Project found that 71% say the country should focus on making sure everyone has a fair chance to succeed. Just 21% think the focus should be on reducing income inequality

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (61275)	11/30/2011 10:45:04 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	1 Recommendation Respond to of 103300

Weather’s Too Nice For Global Warming Alarmists Posted 06:36 PM ET Environment: Sunday will be the 2,232nd consecutive day that the U.S. has gone without being hit by a major hurricane. This is a big enough deal to be covered by the mainstream media. But of course it won't be. On Dec. 4, a new record will be set for the number of days between landfalls of category 3 or stronger storms. The previous streak, according to Roger Pielke Jr., began on Sept. 8, 1900, and ended on Oct. 19, 1906, when the Great Galveston Hurricane hit. The record won't be broken by just a day or even a week. Pielke, a professor of environmental studies at University of Colorado, says it will be crushed. "Since there won't be any intense hurricanes before next summer, the record will be shattered, with the days between intense hurricane landfalls likely to exceed 2,500 days," he writes in his blog. Why is this significant? Because the global warming alarmists have been telling us that man's carbon dioxide emissions would bring bigger storms. Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology promoted the idea in a 2005 paper. He claimed that in the mid-1970s global warming began causing hurricane destruction to increase. Emanuel believed that the damage would grow worse. Al Gore, the kaiser of the alarmists, picked up on the notion and, as he is wont to do, lectured the public as if he were both an expert and a moral superior. In "An Inconvenient Truth," he rants about an "emerging consensus" that links "global warming to increasingly destructive power of hurricanes, increasing the strength of the average hurricane a full half-step on the well-known 5-step scale." The National Wildlife Federation — of course — has also fanned the hysteria. It was happy to report on "the latest science" which connects "hurricanes and global warming" and "suggests more is yet to come." "Tropical storms are likely to bring higher wind speeds, more precipitation, and a bigger storm surge in the coming decades," said the NWF. The mainstream media has happily trafficked this nonsense, but it's not likely to mention Pielke's point even though it would be appropriate in stories covering our very mild hurricane season, which ended Wednesday. Why won't they do it? Because it's inconsistent with their narrative. It's like the latest batch of Climategate emails, which show again a group of scientists manipulating the process for political gain. News that contradicts the alarmists' tale simply isn't news to the media.