Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (118847)	12/1/2011 11:31:45 AM
From: Justin C	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224742

At times of serious discontent in the country, such as in 1968 and 1980, voters tend to go for the other party, even when Nixon (very intelligent but personality/character-challenged) was the candidate. Let's hope history repeats itself in the present period of serious discontent, regardless of the candidate. .

To: Carolyn who wrote (118847)	12/13/2011 3:31:22 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224742

National media seems to be gleeful to see Newt as Repub's frontrunner. That's because they know they've enough fodder to defeat him for Obama. Romney has a cleaner record - they'd have difficulty smearing a man who has been married to the same woman for many years and admits he'd rather not get cut-throat in order to knock Newt off his current perch. Good news is that Romney would not have to wage a negative campaign against Obama in order to win - all he'd have to do is tell the truth loud and clear about Obama's wrong-headed policies from now until Nov, 2012.