SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (83980)12/1/2011 6:46:11 PM
From: Metacomet1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218070
 
Interesting response.

For one to suggest that Christ was probably a fictional construct does not strike me as a particularly religious argument.

Of course that is why we shouldn't discuss "religion".

It is all made up, all flavors, of smoke, mirrors, misinterpretations, superstition and supernatural phenomena.

Obviously stuff that grown ups ought to avoid at all costs.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (83980)12/1/2011 6:47:25 PM
From: Solon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218070
 
"I think you will notice from the other responses that we actually don't discuss religion here"

You would think wrong. I came to the thread off a link that shared a post about Jesus/Religion. I have no idea what is in the other 80 some thousand posts on this thread!

My post was to that post only. It responded precisely to the claims of the post. I left the other 80 some thousand posts alone (so perhaps we are both unclear on the "other responses"...eh)??

I trust my opinion regarding the posted comparison of Communism with Christian dogma was of assistance to some? I hope so. It seems to have harmed your delicate preference for preferred speech, however, and I am sorry for that. It is difficult when one first discovers OTHER and realize that they (THEMSELVES) are not OTHER...but are merely one dust mote amongst gazillions.

I responded to the topic of the post I responded to. I realise it has nothing to do with the financial collapse of 2001!! I did not know you decided what was to be discussed outside of that so I responded to what WAS being discussed (and it surely wasn't THAT!!).

You might want to steer it back to the Financial Collapse as you are clearly the self appointed thread master!!

Please feel free to exert maximum control on your own preferred free speech. I realize that information and discussion can be confusing and I can well appreciate where you are coming from. Free speech from others can be quite daunting! It is best to discourage it!! Best wishes to you in this holiday season, Mr. or Mrs. Swan...



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (83980)12/1/2011 8:27:33 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218070
 
It has been discussed here before,

siliconinvestor.com

and Ayn Rand,

siliconinvestor.com

plus evolution

siliconinvestor.com

and Mr. J C Christ to.

siliconinvestor.com