Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (5772)	11/20/1997 5:06:00 PM
From: sh	Respond to of 20681

Mark is 100% right. You try to get them to accuse Ledoux of fraud and they will back off completely. Mark and I know, we have tried.

To: mark silvers who wrote (5772)	11/20/1997 11:42:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Mark, I think the "worry card" in the Naxos COC PR is the large difference in the COC sample and the non-COC. What's the significance of that variance? There weren't enough samples to draw much of a resource conclusion and that variability could be what Kitty is focusing on. Take the standard deviation of all the values reported, that should give you a clue. We can't even begin discuss probability for the property. These guys are far from stupid. The way to slam the door in their short face is to produce sufficient samples that PROVE the metals.