Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kimberley who wrote (27873)	11/20/1997 5:33:00 PM
From: sh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Kim, With all due respect, what about Hungry Lion (or whatever the basket case's name is)? He claims Naxos is going to go down big time. Does he present any facts to back up his wild claim? If he did, God knows I would listen intently. He presents nothing! To earn respect, you have to give details not general, bald assertions. Charters and this character have had nothing but bald assertions about Naxos. I have not followed the IPM saga too closely so I really cannot comment on it. But like other posters have said, either put up or shut up regarding Naxos (not that I would support forcing them to shut up, they are entitled to their views and if they get out of hand, we have laws to deal with that). Regards, sh

To: kimberley who wrote (27873)	11/20/1997 5:43:00 PM
From: Roger Cordell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

<<.....be man enough to stand up >> Kimberley - I think it is safe to say that everyone holding IPMCF over the weekend feels terrible about the news release numbers and the resulting price decline. I know from talking with Lew last Thursday and Friday that he was sticking his neck out, going longer on IPMCF. But he did it because he believed that the gold was there (which it is), but he, like all of us, expected much better numbers. Lew really did his homework, but he is not psychic. Are you? Roger

To: kimberley who wrote (27873)	11/20/1997 6:13:00 PM
From: Joe Staniszewski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

When this finally plays out (whatever way it goes) Lew will have one helluva screenplay. The naysayers, like it or not, at this point have much more credibility than the "Moon Shot" hypers. What's more detrimental, some known disbeliever stating "Naxos is going down" or a hyper stating that "whisper numbers are .20 OPT"? No one should base their investment decisions on these and if you do, you get what you deserve.However, when the company deliberately withholds information like it has, what kind of due diligence can anyone do? I love Ron Struthers' comment about Doyle being a master at raising money. That's an understatement. He just got $1.4 million from a company that will have trouble paying its own bills. How can you feel good about investing in this?