Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scott harrison who wrote (5425)	11/20/1997 5:53:00 PM
From: robert cartelli	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9124

ya ....sure today was great, but all this upbeat news and predictions of higher prices for this undervalued co. is what alot of us have been saying for the last 3 weeks now. glad the "pros" finally agree. like i posted a couple of days ago, you need to be able to see the forest (value) thru all the CRAP. r

To: scott harrison who wrote (5425)	11/20/1997 6:38:00 PM
From: scott harrison	Respond to of 9124

Sheba: Believe me, not to encourage Vanni, but he has been saying positive things about QNTM on the SEG thread... <Forced to predict, I would say these stocks (QNTM aside) won't go anywhere significant for three to six months, and may start to regroup during the summer or fall. The sector could be all patched up in 1999, and then WDC and SEG could move into the 30s or even higher. Anyone cutting and pasting this out six months from now to show how stupid I am please include this: this is only a guess since there are too many variables that are hard to predict. For now, though, stay away from these stocks, other than QNTM. Sell 'em if you have 'em, take your losses and put you money to better use elsewhere. You can always buy these stocks back three to five months from now at the same price, if for some strange reason you are married to them.> methinks he loves quantum just like the rest of us. scott