Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119277)	12/6/2011 5:02:03 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

snopes is run by two idiot liberals no one believes them

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119277)	12/6/2011 5:07:58 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

"Snopes' normal standard for political "truth:" Claims against Republicans: If there is ANY element of the entire claim that can be construed as being less than 100% false, they judge the story true. Claims against Democrats: If there is ANY element of the entire claim that can be construed as being less than 100% true, they judge the story false."

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119277)	12/6/2011 5:08:26 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

"Does Snopes have a liberal Bias? In our Search for the truth…..department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep you got it. Snopes lied! Everyone of those dockets are there. So Here is what I wrote Snopes: Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Court's website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to . I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future. ************* That being said, I'll bet you didn't know this. Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on... Once again the US Senate sold us out! Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!! Check out these examples: supremecourt.gov <>;http://www.supremecourt.gov/Sear%20ch.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm%3E; supremecourt.gov <http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm supremecourt.gov <>http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm%3E If you are not interested in justice or in truth delete this However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution…"