Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (18275)	12/7/2011 6:23:05 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Brumar's reply would not stand up in court as no one called him to be a witness to my posts. There is also a clear demonstrably record of my posts and obviously several witnesses other than himself. So whether or not he did not observe me posting he was still lying in suggesting and leading people to believe I was not familiar with the thread. Ignorance of my posts being there is no excuse on Brumar's part. "It wasn't a lie, I hadn't seen you post there before." His back peddling explanation does not hold water. He is of course relying on the old tree falling in the forest routine. "If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound?" I wonder where he gets these habits of hurling, slandering and bearing false witness from? "The most common English synonym for "Satan" is "Devil", which descends from Middle English devel, from Old English deofol, that in turn represents an early Germanic borrowing of Latin diabolus (also the source of "diabolical"). This in turn was borrowed from Greek diabolos "slanderer", from diaballein "to slander": dia- "across, through" + ballein "to hurl".