Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary L Schultz who wrote (5097)	11/20/1997 8:20:00 PM
From: David Coakley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6735

Your views and opinions are always welcome and appreciated here Gary. Tell us again how wonderfully happy you are with your fantastic returns during 1997! Please! While you're at it go on and tell us how right you and Asensio were about Solv-Ex the entire time and how the fact that the short sellers who had (and possibly still have) millions of shares sold short, many naked, had nothing to do with Solv-Ex's troubles. What a swell guy. Why don't you donate some of those returns so you too can get a spot at Arlington National Cemetary! (Where my Father happens to be buried.) Seeya real soon, Dave

To: Gary L Schultz who wrote (5097)	11/21/1997 1:14:00 AM
From: bettino	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

Actually Gary, I see things quite differently. If all goes well, Solv will be debt free and have a major partner who is willing to spend up to a billion bucks to devolp the project using SOLV's technology and allow SOLV to move on with their minerals. I believe Koch also mentioned they planned on purchasing shares of SOLv once they began trading (off bulletin board?). Solv needed to get out of debt. This deal does that. Solv needed cash to finance their project. This deal does that. Solv needed a partner. They got it. Solv needed a major credible source in their corner. They got it. Solv needed major business know-how help. This deal will do that. SUMMATION: Solv can now be the technology brains and piggy back on Koch's business savy. Isn't that what they needed all along???????????? You may have to firmly disagree, but I feel we are in a much better position than we have been over the last year. Solv was absolutly dead without this development. I take the news as good. You mentioned that 3/4 of our company was ripped off- what else was SOLV supposed to do? ...close up shop? Would that have been better for shareholders?? I'm sure many (possiblly you?) wanted Solv to die. This is a MAJOR development that rescues SOLV. Sorry that you are so smug and crude. If it is attention that you wish to get, well, you have effectlively acheived that over the past year. Seems like you enjoy attempting to destroy any glimpse of hope, even though you claim to not care about what happens. That is ridiculous! Sorry, but one must question your motives...... Maybe it is your style...... Thanks for your opinions, even though over time you lost my respect through your tactless delivery and persistent pessimism. My opinion. Rob