Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (84346)	12/10/2011 12:04:09 PM
From: Hawkmoon	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217619

are you talking about the usa? or france, or italy? Never said the US was perfect, but generally after a US military intervention, the result has been a better standard of living for the people involved. However, I acknowledge the embarrassing fact that we've often supported non-democratic regimes out of national interest. But we're not trying to annex those countries either. you are certainly not talking about china, per simple history Sure I am.. Tibet, Taiwan, Vietnam.. and they certainly supported N. Korea in an attempt to conquer S. Korea (losing hundreds of thousands of Chinese soldier's lives in the process). Can you state one case where Chinese soldiers died to further the power of a people to have a democratic say in their government? And remember all the military support China provided to Pol Pot.. And then there is the military support to the Military leadership in Burma (Myamar) over the past decades. Those are/were Chinese weapons. en.wikipedia.org Go to Cambodia someday and mention Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot freely in public.. I dare you.. The Cambodian population REMAINS traumatized to this day by what was inflicted upon them by a Chinese Puppet. Hawk