SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (84383)12/10/2011 9:48:57 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218107
 
The Iranians don't exactly have good grounds to complain after the 1979 takeover of the US embassy and the recent damage to the UK's. A drone here and there, pffft, big deal, relatively speaking. The Iranians would never declare war, anyway.



To: elmatador who wrote (84383)12/11/2011 12:21:45 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Respond to of 218107
 
When is an attack on an embassy an act of war? <There is the legality issue: when a drone attack is considered an act of war? > When is threatening to obliterate a country [which necessarily includes the people] and act of war? Iran is beyond the pale. Islamic Jihad is by definition an act of war.

Mqurice


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News