Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119600)	12/11/2011 9:42:18 AM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

DUH DUH DUH You are illustrating your failed taxpayer paid education, or lack thereof AGAIN. Was Paul V your principal? You are able to post here and refute anything, dingleberry, and you chose NOT to dispute my honest and accurate remarks. Apples vs oranges, and you make no sense at all. BUSTED CLEAR AS DAYLIGHT as a HYPOCRITE. BTW, your link is totally bogus, and I waited 15 minutes to tell you since WE learned quite a bit from it. Nobody can make this stuff up, and you need to take your pills and calm down.

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119600)	12/11/2011 12:46:19 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

Michelle Obama Secret Affair Rumors Surface Hey, if the gay President can have b/f's why can't she? Let's see how late night TV / SNL / Comedy Central handle this. Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, December 10, 2011, 9:00 PM Maybe this explains all of those extravagant vacations? Is Michelle Obama busted? It’s a good thing her last name is not Cain or this story would be making major headlines by now. America’s Conservative News reported: The Globe magazine just released a bombshell and is reporting that Michelle Obama is having a “steamy secret affair” with a Secret Service Agent. According to The Globe, rumors started to circulate that Obama may be having an affair after her recent admission to NBC’s Al Roker that she frequently “sneaks out” of the White House; and the ever increasing time she is spending away from the White House may be a cover to hide “a sizzling affair she’s carrying on with a Secret Service agent.” According to The Globe’s anonymous source: “The rumors are that she’s getting it on with a Secret Service agent who is not part of her detail. … Her frequent outings away from the White House give her and him an opportunity to get together.” The source adds: “Something has been going on for a couple of months and there’s no question Barack is embarrassed about her increasingly frequent excursions away from him at the White House.” The allegations are, of course, unsubstantiated and only time will tell if the allegations will fizzle or blow up into a major issuing in the upcoming presidential campaign. Typically, the media will not report unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources, but the recent media feeding frenzy over unsubstantiated allegation against businessman Herman Cain, which literally sank his candidacy, leave the question open: will the media pursue, or even bother to investigate this story? When it comes to the Mainstream Media, anything goes. That much is clear. But will the media apply the same standard to Obama as to Cain? Only time will tell. Hat Tip Rachel http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/12/michelle-obama-secret-affair-rumors-surface/

To: gronieel2 who wrote (119600)	12/13/2011 10:37:15 AM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Unions require photo ID's to vote: Needle on Hypocrisy-Meter Breaks Off: Unions require photo IDs to vote in their elections Gee, I guess the unions are raaacist. [Via] John Romano at " Yes, But, However!" at the link. He asks the perplexing question of why do Democrats so fear voter ID? Apparently even unions don't see the requirement of a photo ID as too burdensome. "A picture is worth a thousand words. According to OpenSecrets.org unions belonging to the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) have donated over $26 million to Democratic candidates and causes since 1990. During that same period, the union gave a paltry $272,311 to the Republican Party. As you’ll note in the photo below the union requires its own members to produce a photo ID in order to vote. The photo shows a union worker voting earlier today on whether to sanction a new four-year contract with Boeing, clearly the union understands the need for a picture ID in order to help guarantee a clean election: In America, one needs an ID to vote in a union election, buy liquor, drive a car, board an airplane, use a credit card and a slew of other things in our society. Yet, the Democratic party refuses to back the idea of requiring an ID to vote in state and federal elections under any circumstances. A sensible voter ID law that respects the rights of the poor, elderly, and minorities is a great idea. What are Democrats afraid of? You connect the dots. ....http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/12/someone-alert-eric-holder-unions.html