Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (15134)	12/12/2011 11:40:19 AM
From: donpat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

JBI uses the antiquated rotating drum kiln process. That's like cutting crops with a horse drawn rig rather than an engine driven combine. But it works - there are just MUCH better ways these days.

To: scion who wrote (15134)	12/12/2011 1:10:18 PM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

Re:<"JK Rowling may be better able to explain the details."> Maybe. If we use money as a measure then JK Rowling is a better fiction writer than Mr. Bordynuik, but not by many orders of magnitude. JK Rowling's fiction pulled in about 45 million pounds (about $70 million) for her last year. If we figure that Mr. Bordynuik pushed out 18 million shares and using the current price of $1.50, then Mr. Bordynuik's fiction pulled in $27 million this year. JK Rowling - $70 million in a year John Bordynuik - $27 million in a year. Writing fiction is certainly very profitable. However I don't believe JK Rowling is in any danger of going to jail for fraud.