Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (61893)	12/12/2011 4:15:41 PM
From: mazel-tov	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

"I appreciate your attempt to clarify, but you're paraphrasing inaccurately... what you just did is exactly what I said people typically do, they paraphrase and bend it around to fit what they "think" they heard..." Here is what he said during the debate: "“I do not believe that the people of the United States are going to take people who have been here a quarter century, who have children and grandchildren, who are members of the community, who may have done something 25 years ago, separate them from their families, and expel them." After the debate he said by way of clarification that he was not for amnesty, but that he supported a legalization process for immigrants that have been in the U.S. for the past 25 years and have already established generations of family in the country." So I am not sure in what way my comments are at variance with what Gingrich said or how I am "bend(ing) it around to fit what they 'think' they heard." He also said that he was willing to take the heat for his proposal because he knew that there was a constituency that would opposed the legalization of illegals.