Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : BuSab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quote 007 who wrote (11027)	12/13/2011 5:03:46 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23934

true, I have not read everything about the situation. What little I know of it makes no sense to me though. I know a little bit about the security that goes into the wireless connections in military devices. So I have a hard time believing that the iranians could have hacked it in a timeframe that would be meaningful. Therefore, it makes no sense to me that it was hijacked as suggested. Nor do I believe that someone with no training could have controlled it had they been successful in hijacking it. It also makes no sense to me that there was no self destruct built into it. But yes, it does take some nads to request a spy device back from the country that was being spied on. I thought the explosions were a couple of months ago. Were there more this past week?