Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (15214)	12/13/2011 5:56:39 PM
From: SteveF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53574

Any truth to the bankruptcy filing rumor?

To: Steady_on who wrote (15214)	12/13/2011 6:47:14 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

Way back in the initial permit process there was wording that required JBI to show that the output product wouldn't wind up as waste. I took the liberty of translating that into marketable. Message 27820074 Do you have any evidence for that assertion?

To: Steady_on who wrote (15214)	12/13/2011 7:04:07 PM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

Re:<"So the short answer is... no ... you have no evidence for that assertion."> Steady_on, I'd like to shift this just slightly because this is an ongoing theme on many topics. I assert that the "petroleum distillate" wasn't plastic-derived, my guess being simply purchased, blended and resold through the blending facility which Mr. Bordynuik purchased from his aunt's boyfriend and considers part of the P2O division. You assert that the petroleum distillate sold to Coco Asphalt was derived from plastic. Mr. Bordynuik, whether intentionally or unintentionally, has been vague about that in every single mention of Coco since they were first mentioned in spring. Mr. Bordynuik never even stumbled upon a combination of words saying that the product sold to Coco was derived from plastic. Any mention of Coco is pretty clean of any direct statements to that effect. You, as someone who believes in Mr. Bordynuik, have the opportunity to e-mail him for clarification but you instead ask me for evidence one way or the other. I can't e-mail him because, although he reads my e-mails, he ignores them because he doesn't like what I post on the message boards (as evidenced by the cease and desist letter he had his lawyer send me last year). You can see how these conversations continually lead nowhere. In your opinion and given our constraints, what would be the best way to find out whether the petroleum distillate sold to Coco was really petroleum distillate or whether it was instead fuel derived from pyrolysis of waste plastic? Seriously, I'm not just asking to be rhetorical.