Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hank2010 who wrote (91729)	12/18/2011 9:23:15 AM
From: jpthoma1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233882

Right hank2010, Here in Québec, we have biennal work requirements and renewal fees. And don't miss the due date because you'll loose your claims 30 days later. JP

To: hank2010 who wrote (91729)	12/19/2011 6:46:01 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 233882

Great story. I always had my doubts about Champion Bare, and that tale sort of confirms it. They are so suable. Patents and leases, once were recoverable by the principle I spoke about, i.e. relief from forfeiture. This principle, enshrined in Anglo Saxon law since the Magna Carta to give relief from excess taxes on widows and orphans and arbitrary levies by the King in order to possess baronial estates, has, it appears, been repealed by an aggressive Ontario government who seeks to adopt the mantle of the Plantagenets in order to better fleece their beleaguered subjects. Theft by taxation is an old government trick. Fasken Martineau fasken.com "In the commercial lease context, relief from forfeiture arises where a tenant’s breach of lease exposes it to a landlord’s entitlement to cancel the lease. Such judicial reinstatement of the lease in the form of relief from forfeiture evolved in the Courts of Chancery. In BC, it is now a legislated remedy found in s. 24 of the Law & Equity Act, R.S.B.C., 1996, c. 253: 24. The Court may relieve against all penalties and forfeitures, and in granting the relief impose any terms as to costs, expenses, damages, compensations and all other matters that the court thinks fit." I agree companies should pay dues to keep the an, as they never paid good money for the land up front. However there are often millions invested and the mere missing of a due date should not arbitrarily toss that investment down the drain, rendering the powerless shareholder bereft.