SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120149)12/19/2011 11:02:02 AM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224756
 
It will be up to the states to define what are essential health care benefits under the health care law.

Substantiation or a link, please. Forgive me for not just taking your word for this.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120149)12/19/2011 11:03:24 AM
From: lorne4 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224756
 
ken...it is always a bit of fun to find out where you get your new talking points/orders each day?

....."It will be up to the states to define what are essential health care benefits under the health care law. In other words, this is NOT a federal take over of health care."....

US won’t define required health care benefits
States will set rules within wide categories
By Robert Pear |
New York Times
December 17, 2011

WASHINGTON - In a major surprise on the politically charged new health care law, the Obama administration said yesterday that it would not define a single uniform set of “essential health benefits’’ that must be provided by insurers for tens of millions of Americans.

Instead, it will allow each state to specify the benefits within broad categories.

Full Article...

bostonglobe.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120149)12/19/2011 11:13:11 AM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224756
 
ken...."It will be up to the states to define what are essential health care benefits under the health care law. In other words, this is NOT a federal take over of health care.'...

Well ken is it possible that Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan may have given hussein obama a heads up on the pending case...hey boss change things up a bit so things will fit better? So what do you think ken? :-)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120149)12/19/2011 11:39:34 AM
From: CF Rebel5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224756
 
It will be up to the states to define what are essential health care benefits under the health care law. In other words, this is NOT a federal take over of health care.

So, in other words, Obamacare will be a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma from the shallow depths of the callow, fantasy-driven minds of Obama and friends.

Thank you for that profound clarification.

CF Rebel