SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nevada9999 who wrote (207935)12/19/2011 1:58:23 PM
From: pocotrader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312813
 
Nevada 9999, if RPM's ownership of the claims is confirmed, what is your gut feeling on the type of settlement?



To: Nevada9999 who wrote (207935)12/19/2011 1:59:04 PM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312813
 
Replying to a comment to that article, the editor writes that Coeur "claimed in court they're in the process of recovering their claims. In court documents they claim the common law doctrine of pedis possessio; that is, they possess the property, they’re actually working it, and have done so since 1986."

fwiw, I've no idea myself.



To: Nevada9999 who wrote (207935)12/19/2011 1:59:34 PM
From: czechmate  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312813
 
There was no trespass as at the time of staking, those lands were in the public domain, safety violations perhaps but that not gonna hold water as far as title goes. Another sidelight here is those claims CDE held were leased from another party,which according to all standard procedures, requires CDE to keep them in good standing. CDE best cut their losses expediently or they will have another lawsuit on their hands.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News