Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: czechmate who wrote (207952)	12/19/2011 3:08:34 PM
From: czechmate	Respond to of 312809

Actually,if you think about it,this screw up by CDE could be very fortuitous for them ,if they had the good sense to realize it, take out RPM and all the assets that RPM has, starting point might be 2.00,maybe 3.00, at 2.00 would be 280 mil$ total,it would probably cost them half of that to get back those claims in any event. and...............SAVE FACE as well mitigating any further lawsuits.

To: czechmate who wrote (207952)	12/19/2011 3:17:50 PM
From: Nevada9999	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312809

I held RPM before the Rochester headlines because of their gold/silver resources in the Lovelock area. I also like the Cortez trend properties though I try not to do drill bit plays in bad markets. Results there are potentially a big positive as you say. The whole Rochester thing is kind of seedy and at this point I'm skeptical there will be a windfall from here from Rochester. I think it's a good company and plan to hold for better times for gold stocks.