Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dvdw© who wrote (20204)	12/20/2011 12:37:23 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 24758

Depends on thier behavior does it not. No. If Rupert Murdoch wants to turn News Corp over to his son, I could care less. If he wants to gut the company and hurt all employees to get back at his son,I could care less. The markets agree with me. If a company sheds shareholder equity as its main goal, it has suborned the status of its commitment to investors capital, to the goals of some internationalist agenda, its malfeasance. Then, at the next shareholders meeting, the shareholders ought to hire Gordon(He has such excellent taste in art according to Darryl).. ....its the shareholders business to know to the best of thier ability to what extent a corporations management is for or against the shareholders they are bound to serve. Yes, but they rarely care these days. It was different in the '50s when shareholders ruled and proxy wars were tours du jour. Hierarchies arise in society that compromise what should never happen, by way of example the media companies are routinely taking sides in service to one political agenda or another...these choices are made by committees of folks whose service records are and should be questioned. I have no problem with that and neither does the Constitution up to the 1st amendment.