Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (120531)	12/24/2011 1:19:56 AM
From: Paul V.	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224729

Tonto, I have seen some become very bad because of management changes. We can agree with this statement. Managerial leadership style completely make the difference. I am a strong believer and as a manager used the "participatory style of management." However, if you get some management who wants to rule by the "iron fist" in a punitive manner he/she creates a hostile environment for creating issues. The community union organizer is constantly looking for what is called, "continuing multiple issues to organize around. A participatory style of manage (win-win approach) using a collegial style of manager believing in collaboration very seldom has issues created. Therefore, there is no issues to organize around. As a manager I put in place steps for conflict resolution rather than personalized conflict (win-lose) approach. The win-lose approach is what I see happening in our current political system today. However, there are some A__hole managers who try to exercise their person power failing to realize that it is the position which has the power rather than they. The psychological reasons for these types of individuals is here to debate.