SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: go4it who wrote (27899)11/21/1997 4:15:00 AM
From: brent hyatt  Respond to of 35569
 
Some scam artists from down in Australia
Knew with time they'd find a con to nail ya
So they staked out some sand
And hollered "There's gold in this land!"
You bought it, and now they've impailed ya. :)



To: go4it who wrote (27899)11/21/1997 9:56:00 AM
From: Theo  Respond to of 35569
 
I sold at 38% higher than I bought last year. I'm buying again. Gold dropped $80 an oz during the same period. I had many opportunities to sell at higher levels, and did so. The trick is buy at the bottom. If a short thinks its the bottom, then they are right. They cause the bottom. The few little fish left in this barrel will die trying.
Strategy #1 = When the shorts buy, I buy.
Strategy #2 = When the shorts sell, I sell.
It makes sense as a trader. Institutions, Mutuals, Shorts, Individuals = All the same strategy, All the same timing, All one big happy family.
IPMCF is a great buy right now for EVERYBODY. He who hesitates.....
Theo



To: go4it who wrote (27899)11/21/1997 12:45:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 35569
 
<< We have the mineralization and that is clear to me. >>

Chuck, We clearly have some mineralization, that is clear to everyone, and has been since December 1995.. Do you mean that we have the mineralization that will permit us to extract 0.25+ opt Au? Do we have the mineralization that will permit us to recover 0.81 opt Au-equivalent?

BTW what happened to those 900kg bulk samples that were yielding 0.25+ Au with no degredation? This is a situation in which some words of answer would have been welcomed by the shareholders. Did the bulk test suddenly stop working? Wouldn't that have been negative information that would have to have been released to the public? Clearly the recovery process didn't work when submitted to a third party for verification -- despite what we were told in several press releases. Does this make you uneasy?

I'll have something to say about all the vaunted "research" in a day or two.

O. H.