Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (177957)	12/25/2011 4:27:51 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 543837

<<<<Paul is an isolationist, who would probably have resisted going into WWII>>> Koan, I don't know how to break this to you but America DID resisted going to war in WWII. I'll remind you that it wasn't until after we were attacked that we entered the war. To suggest that Ron Paul would have stayed out of the war after Pearl Harbor is just loony. <<<< Paul is a small minded crazy person>>>> Now it is the man who suggest we don't go around the world starting wars that is crazy? That the man who wants to bring our financial house under control so we don't end up like Greece is crazy? Have we learned absolutely nothing after VietNam, Iraq and Afghanistan? Have we learned nothing from our last bubble and the economic Armageddon? I guess not, let's go do it again! Merry Christmas to you; Steve

To: koan who wrote (177957)	12/25/2011 5:24:43 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543837

On foreign and military policy, Ron Paul makes nothing but good sense: youtube.com

To: koan who wrote (177957)	12/26/2011 12:16:29 PM
From: the navigator	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 543837

As an example most of the dems that voted to authorize Bush to go into Iraq did not want to, but knew if they didn't the people would most likely vote them out in the next election. the dems that voted to authorize bush to go into iraq are worse than the r's because they voted against their conscience for money, i.e., they sold us out. i don't really see any difference at all between the d's and the r's. they are both corrupt and self-serving and i'm done with both of them. we need to get the money out of politics, altogether.