SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (14911)11/21/1997 10:28:00 AM
From: Mark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Ike & options folks, re: IBM calls -

Thanks for your input which I value along with everyone else here. You said "talk loud" to get input from others so here's what I see and I hope people find it useful:

I understand the merits of writing the DEC115 calls against the JAN110 since that would decrease the probability of the short calls being exercised (i.e. instead of the DEC110 calls) but I would also sacrifice more premium income unless, as you suggested, I write 1.5 times the number of JAN110 I own. I don't understand where you say the "heavier 110 (jan) will take care of the naked 5 (dec115)" because if, in the odd event the DEC115 were exercised and I had 10 contracts long against the 15 short I would end up needing an extra 500 shares IBM to cover the dec115 call which would not have been covered in premiums. This would be risky for a low-capital investor - can you elaborate?

Right now, IBM DEC115 is 3/4 and DEC110 is about $2. Remember, my basis in the JAN110 is 2 5/8 and I already wrote NOV110 for 1/2 reducing that basis even further. Now, I can:

a. write 10 DEC115 for each JAN110 I own giving me 3/4. If IBM then goes beyond 110 by DEC expiry I still keep the premiums and the great appreciation in the JAN110. If the stock goes sideways or south, I've only recouped 3/4 of the premium paid for the JAN110 versus $2 in the DEC110. Then I'm left hoping the stock moves to a level that makes the JAN110 profitable before JAN expiry. - or -

b. write 10 DEC110 for each JAN110 giving me about $2. If IBM then goes beyond 110 and stays there through DEC expiry I lose the remaining JAN110 basis that I haven't recouped (2 5/8 minus 2 minus the 1/2 for the NOV = net 1/8 loss). If IBM goes south or sideways during DEC then I've reduced my basis in the JAN110 to only 1/8. -or-

c. sell the JAN110 today for about 3 5/8 ($1 profit or $1.5 considering the NOV110 premiums).

"Ideas" anyone?

Happy trades,

mark