SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oblivious who wrote (62746)12/25/2011 8:47:09 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
12 catholic churches bombed on Christmas Eve in Nigeria.






Nigeria rocked by church blasts


The most casualties were caused in the attack near Abuja

Bomb blasts targeting Christmas Day church services in two Nigerian cities have left at least 28 people dead, with three more attacks on other towns.

The Islamist group Boko Haram said it had attacked St Theresa's Church in Madalla, near the capital Abuja, killing 27 people.

A second explosion shortly after hit a church in the central city of Jos. A policeman died during gunfire.

Three attacks in northern Yobe state targeted a church and security forces.

Two hit the town of Damaturu, and a third struck Gadaka. Yobe state has been the epicentre of violence between security forces and Boko Haram militants.

'Everyone was crying'

Boko Haram - whose name means "Western education is forbidden" - often targets security forces and state institutions.

The group carried out an August 2011 suicide attack on the UN headquarters in Abuja, in which more than 20 people were killed.

Nearly 70 people have died this week in fighting between Nigerian forces and Boko Haram gunmen in the country's north-east.

National Emergency Management Agency (Nema) spokesman Yushau Shuaibu told the BBC that the latest Abuja explosion had happened in the street outside the church.

He said the church - which can hold up to 1,000 people - had been badly affected by the blast, and the number of dead was likely to rise.

Witnesses said windows of nearby houses had been shattered by the explosion.

Unconfirmed reports say that emergency responders have been attacked by groups of stone-throwing youths.

Officials at the local hospital said the condition of many of the injured was serious, and they were seeking help from bigger medical facilities.

Businessman Munir Nasidi was in a hotel opposite the church when the blast occurred.



He told the BBC: "When I came out of the hotel, people were running around. Everyone was crying. They were bringing out casualties. Nobody was getting near the building as there was a fire."

A security source told Agence France-Presse that one of the Damaturu explosions was a suicide car bomb attack on a convoy of the State Security Service.

In Jos, a blast close to the Mountain of Fire and Miracles Church was followed by gunfire that left one officer dead, government spokesman Pam Ayuba told Associated Press.

Two explosive devices found in a nearby building were disarmed as military were deployed to the site.

BBC Africa editor Martin Plaut says the attack in Jos, in Plateau state, could have even more serious consequences than the attack in Abuja.

The state lies in Nigeria's so-called Middle Belt, between the mainly Muslim north and Christian south.

More than 1,000 have been killed in religious and ethnic violence in Jos over the past two years and our correspondent says there will be fears that the latest attack could spark wider conflict.

A string of bomb blasts in Jos on Christmas Eve 2010 were claimed by Boko Haram.

Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi condemned the latest attacks as blind, absurd "terrorist violence" that enflames hate.

"We are close to the suffering of the Nigerian Church and the entire Nigerian people so tried by terrorist violence, even in these days that should be of joy and peace," Lombardi was quoted by Reuters news agency as saying.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague also condemned the bombings.

He said: "These are cowardly attacks on families gathered in peace and prayer to celebrate a day which symbolises harmony and goodwill towards others. I offer my condolences to the bereaved and injured."



washingtonpost.com



To: Oblivious who wrote (62746)12/25/2011 9:06:46 PM
From: joseffy3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Holder's arrogance has no parallel in politics today.
.................................................................................................
Obama's new plan for stuffing ballot boxes

December 23, 2011 Tom Tancredo

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=380533

Each week seems to bring a new assault on the Constitution from Attorney General Eric Holder.

When will Congress decide enough is enough and launch a full-on impeachment probe?

Holder's arrogance has no parallel in politics today. Halting the prosecution of New Black Panther Party voter intimidation activities, subverting immigration law enforcement and stonewalling a congressional investigation into the Fast and Furious scheme are not enough for Holder and the Obama administration. Now they are taking aim at state laws designed to prevent vote fraud in the 2012 election.

Holder announced recently in a speech in Austin, Texas, that he thinks requiring a person to show a photo ID to cast a ballot is a reincarnation of Jim Crow laws that obstructed black registration and voting. Citing the 1965 Voting Rights Act, Obama's Attorney General threatens to use the full powers of the federal government to overturn any state law that can be shown to have a "disparate impact" on minority voting.

Liberals like Holder who make such arguments have a couple of formidable obstacles. First, those words – "disparate impact" – do not appear in the 1965 voting rights legislation. Those words and that standard are an addition to the law created by federal judges as an extension of the original meaning and purpose of the act.

A second big obstacle for Holder is that the U.S. Supreme Court has more than once upheld state laws requiring photo ID to vote and similar voter integrity measures. If administered fairly and in a color-blind fashion, they are legal.

Holder and Obama already know this. They know that in the short term, they will probably lose such cases. But their real plan as far as 2012 is concerned is not litigation. It is intimidation.

They only have to win this one election. If they do, all future elections will be different.

Their motives and long-term goals are revealed in another of Holder's ideas – the vast expansion of voter rolls. His idea is not yet a legislative proposal, but we can expect to see it in full bloom if Obama wins a second term.

Attorney General Holder does not believe it is enough to prohibit racial discrimination in voter registration or voting procedures. It is not enough for each state to guarantee that any person legally eligible to vote may register to vote, and if they choose to do so, can vote in an election. Holder believes we must stretch the concept of non-discrimination to guarantee equal outcomes at the ballot.

Holder believes that since minorities do not turn out to vote in the same percentages as Caucasians, the present system is discriminatory on its face. In his view, the system must be redesigned to assure equal turnouts by all racial, ethnic and gender classes.


Holder suggests two radical changes in how we fulfill our "civic obligation" to vote. Since it is a civic obligation, Holder wants active government measures to insure each person fulfills that obligation. How? He wants automatic voter registration for every person who turns 18, and he wants to see energetic government efforts to guarantee that every person registered to vote actually casts a ballot. States that do not enact such measures will be held in violation of the law.

Now, you may object that such a radical redesign of our voter registration and voting practices is nowhere mandated under the U.S. Constitution, and you would be right. But you would also be missing the point. If the Constitution is what five of nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court say it is on any given Monday, then anything is possible. If you propose it, and somehow get Congress to enact it, you may eventually find five judges to agree with you.

How will election outcomes be different under Holder's vision of 100 percent voter registration and 100 percent guaranteed turnout? Instead of the usual pattern of differing Republican and Democrat turnout and usually lower unaffiliated voter turnout, differences based on candidates and issues, we would have 100 percent "turnout" from all registered voters in every election. Bear in mind that "turnout" no longer means what it meant for 200 years. Now a voter can cast a ballot from home – or from a homeless shelter, hospital bed or church parking lot – three weeks ahead of Election Day.

Are you wondering how an enlightened, progressive government will encourage and facilitate this "100 percent participation" in elections? Well, use your imagination. Never mind that such "total participation" for total community happiness is achieved only in totalitarian regimes.

To achieve this sublime state of participatory cohesion will require an army of "community organizers" and "civic participation advocates" – funded by government grants. That army will help the less informed and less motivated amongst us fill out our ballots correctly and put them in the mail. No one must be allowed to shrink from his civic duty, even if they are abysmally ignorant of the issues and have to be coached and "assisted" in casting a ballot. As I said, use your imagination and get your grant application ready.

Through such measures as Holder is proposing, the "progressive state" will move a giant step closer to its ultimate aim: manipulation of elections to prevent any interruption or change in direction of "public services." Elections will no longer be permitted to subvert or obstruct the progressive agenda.

It does seem odd that minorities have no problem meeting the requirement for a photo ID when driving a car, cashing a check or passing through security at an airport. Yet, somehow, to Eric Holder, the act of voting is different. We are asked to believe – and judges are being asked to interpret the law to say – that requiring a photo ID to vote has discriminatory motives.

In one sense, Holder is right. Requiring a photo ID to vote does indeed discriminate: It discriminates against fraud.

Unfortunately, to Eric Holder and his progressive allies, fraud, like racism, is only wrong if perpetrated by the bad guys and never wrong when practiced by the good guys. The Catch-22 is this: Citizens at large do not get to decide who are the bad guys or the good guys. That would be an excess of democracy. Only activist judges committed to our "living Constitution" get to decide that.



To: Oblivious who wrote (62746)12/25/2011 9:19:31 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 103300
 
ACORN leaders ramp up White House visitations
.............................................................................................................
Strategy developing to tilt elections to Democrats
December 24, 2011
wnd.com


Operatives of the radical left-wing ideology of ACORN appear to be working with the Obama administration on a strategy to tilt the 2012 elections in favor of Democrats, according to award-winning investigative reporter Matthew Vadum. ACORN leaders have made multiple visits to the Obama White House and the Department of Justice, new evidence shows.

Their goal is to get the government to spend more money on registering welfare recipients and the poor, who are typically Democratic voters, said Vadum, author of the explosive new book "Subversion Inc.: How Obama's ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers."

Obama long ago endorsed the strategy of using welfare recipients to expand the size and scope of government.

Get the inside story on the undermining of the U.S., in "Subversion Inc.: How Obama's ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers."

"All our people must know that politics and voting affects their lives directly," he said in 1992. "If we're registering people in public housing, for an example, we talk about aid cuts and who's responsible."

Obama's Department of Justice has come under fire for refusing to enforce Section 8 of the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA), also known as the Motor-Voter law. Section 8 requires states to remove the names of ineligible felons, the dead, and non-residents from voter rolls. At the same time DOJ has been vigorously enforcing Section 7 which compels states to register voters at welfare offices.

In his book Vadum writes that Section 7 of NVRA amounts to a huge taxpayer subsidy for Democratic candidates. Sanford Newman, founder of ACORN affiliate Project Vote, has acknowledged his group's work helps the Left almost exclusively.

"While our work is nonpartisan, it is realistic to assume that upward of 90 percent of the people we register on unemployment and other social service distribution lines will oppose politicians who have supported cuts in the programs on which they rely," he said. "They are likely to vote Democratic in most instances."

ACORN leaders are pressuring the government to drop pending investigations of massive voter fraud across the nation, said Vadum, a senior editor at Capital Research Center, a think tank that studies left-wing advocacy groups and their funders. His book is the product of nearly three years of research and hundreds of interviews.

So far this year five ACORN leaders visited the White House. One of those ACORN leaders, former ACORN attorney Estelle H. Rogers, is now director of advocacy at ACORN-affiliated Project Vote.

Project Vote is the affiliate of the ACORN network that Obama worked for in 1992 when he led a voter mobilization campaign in Illinois that helped to elect the radical Carol Moseley Braun as a U.S. senator. Obama went on to train ACORN activists and represent ACORN in court as the group's lawyer.

Project Vote's official position is that voter fraud is a myth that Republicans created to deprive Democrats of their votes. The group demonizes anyone who thinks voter ID requirements are good public policy and lobbies for policies that make voter fraud easier to perpetrate.

Rogers visited the Obama White House on March 2, 2011, according to the White House visitors' database. She met with Shasti Conrad, senior aide to Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, and Jon Carson, director of the White House Office of Public Engagement. Carson previously served as chief of staff at the White House Council on Environmental Quality serving under green jobs czar Van Jones, the self-described communist forced out for signing a 9/11 "truther" petition that blamed President George W. Bush for the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act also show that Rogers wrote T. Christian Herren, chief of the Voting Section in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, recommending three candidates for positions at the DOJ.

"I want to heartily recommend two candidates to you," Rogers wrote in a Feb. 23, 2010, email to DOJ's Herren. DOJ redacted the names of the candidates. Rogers followed up on April 20, 2010, writing, "I look forward to continuing to work with you, Chris. And please let me know if you need any more feedback regarding hires."

Rogers wrote another email to Herren on Dec. 7, 2010. "I'd still love to talk for real, but in the meantime, the main reason I called is that you have an applicant for the [REDACTED] position [REDACTED] qualifies ... beautifully for your position, and I hope you will give her every consideration. [REDACTED] So she would be a great fit, and I recommend her without reservation. Please let me know if I can tell you more. And give me a call if you possibly can."

Documents released by Judicial Watch also show that Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli met with "civil rights groups" on March 17, 2011, to talk about Section 7 of NVRA. The groups at the progressive pow-wow were Project Vote, Demos, Brennan Center for Justice, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Fair Elections Legal Network, American Association of People with Disabilities, League of Women Voters, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Paralyzed Veterans of America.

Rogers has been collaborating with the Obama administration since before Inauguration Day in January 2009. She filed what Project Vote called a "voting rights agenda" submission with the Obama-Biden presidential transition team in 2008.

That agenda includes lawsuits filed recently in several states by Project Vote and the groups it is aligned with. The litigation is calculated to intimidate state officials into not investigating claims of rampant voter fraud.

"The lawsuits are coming out of nowhere in multiple states and they are coming fast," said Anita MonCrief, a former Project Vote employee.

"This is part of a coordinated effort," she said. "These groups are very well-funded, and they have lawyers doing pro bono work."

Rogers hinted at the litigation attack in a July 13, 2010, email to Herren and DOJ political appointee Julie Fernandes. Rogers indicated that she would be bringing Project Vote election counsel Niyati Shah to a meeting at DOJ.

Shah "will be working on a lot of the litigation we'll be telling you about."

Rogers said Nicole Kovite Zeitler, director of Project Vote's welfare voter registration project, would also be in attendance.

As reported in Vadum's book, former DOJ lawyer J. Christian Adams said Fernandes told department lawyers that the agency had no interest in enforcing Section 8 of NVRA because, she said, it "doesn’t have anything to do with increasing minority turnout."

Incidentally, Barack Obama wasn't the first leftist to come up with the idea of registering welfare recipients to vote themselves greater benefits at the expense of taxpayers. The idea was put forward in the mid 1960s by communist sympathizers Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. The Marxist duo said "massive numbers of new voters" had to be registered in order to bring "fundamental change" to the nation. Cloward and Piven helped to write the Motor-Voter law. Even today Piven is a member of Project Vote's board of directors.

Four other ACORN operatives visited the Obama White House on March 22, 2011, for a meeting with White House policy assistant David Pope. They are Brian Kettenring, Darlene D. Battle, Steven Fletcher, and Leigh Dingerson.

From 1995 to 2009 Kettenring served as deputy director of national operations for ACORN.

Battle ran ACORN in Philadelphia and is now executive director of Delawareans for Social and Economic Justice, one of two dozen new ACORN front groups that have popped up around the nation. ACORN, the shell corporation that ruled ACORN's network of 370 affiliated groups, filed bankruptcy in November 2010 after ordering its state chapters to incorporate themselves separately in order to carry on ACORN's work.

Fletcher is the former top organizer for ACORN in Minnesota. He is now executive director of Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change (MNNOC), a new ACORN front group.

Dingerson worked as a community organizer with ACORN between 1978 and 1982.