SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John who wrote (62774)12/26/2011 3:22:38 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Joe Arpaio Immigration Case: Judge Rules Against Arizona Sheriff For Illegal Stops
.........................................................................................................................................

WASHINGTON, Dec 23(Reuters) - By Alex Dobuzinskis
main.aol.com


Dec 23 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday barred Arizona
Sheriff Joe Arpaio from detaining people simply for being in the
country illegally, in a ruling that faulted the local lawman for
enforcing federal immigration law.



The opinion by U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow came on
the same day he issued legal sanctions against Arpaio over
destroyed documents.


The sheriff already has faced rebukes from federal agencies
over his controversial efforts to crack down on illegal
immigration.


Both rulings by Snow stemmed from a 2007 civil lawsuit
against Arpaio and his agency, which accuses his officers of
racial profiling of Latinos in traffic stops the judge found
were conducted as immigration sweeps.


The judge also said officers with the Maricopa County
Sheriff's Department, which covers Phoenix and surrounding
areas, circulated emails that "compared Mexicans to dogs" and
portrayed them "as drunks."


"Local law enforcement agencies ... may not enforce civil
federal immigration law," Snow said in his written opinion.



He added that the sheriff's agency could not detain "any
person based only on knowledge or reasonable belief, without
more, that the person is unlawfully present within the United
States."


In his ruling, Snow also granted a request by plaintiffs to
certify the lawsuit as a class action.


Last week, the U.S. Justice Department accused Arpaio and
his deputies of engaging in a "pervasive culture of
discriminatory bias" and violating civil rights laws by singling
out Latinos for unlawful detention and arrests. The same day,
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security barred Arpaio's
deputies from screening jail inmates for their immigration
status.


Arpaio's actions on illegal immigration in Maricopa County
have earned him accolades in conservative political circles.

Arpaio has denied that his department engages in racial profiling and accused the Justice Department under President Barack Obama of undermining immigration enforcement.



To: John who wrote (62774)12/26/2011 7:18:43 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Exactly... and besides, if I want to hate someone or some group, then that's my personal business and choice, who the hell is anyone to tell me what to like and not like? They can all eat shit and drop dead... LOL!!!

GZ