SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120741)12/29/2011 6:09:22 AM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224728
 
THIS IS BRILLIANT….AND COMES FROM A DEMOCRAT!!

Here's an opinion piece by Chuck Green who writes "Greener Pastures" for the Denver Post Aurora Sentinel...one of the more liberal papers in the country. Additionally, Mr. Green is a lifelong Democrat...so this is rather a stunning piece...

Obama is victim of Bush's failed promises!

Barack Obama is setting a record-setting number of records during his first term in office: Largest budget ever. Largest deficit ever.
Largest number of broken promises ever. Most self-serving speeches ever.
Largest number of agenda-setting failures ever. Fastest dive in popularity ever!

Wow! Talk about change.

Just one year ago, fresh from his inauguration celebrations, President Obama was flying high. After one of the nation's most inspiring political campaigns, the election of America 's first black president had captured the hopes and dreams of millions. To his devout followers, it was inconceivable that a year later his administration would be gripped in self-imposed crisis.

Of course, they don't see it as self-imposed. It's all George Bush's fault !

George Bush, who doesn't have a vote in congress and who no longer occupies The White House, is to blame for it all.

He broke Obama's promise to put all bills on the White House web site for five days before signing them.

He broke Obama's promise to have the congressional health care negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.

He broke Obama's promise to end earmarks.

He broke Obama's promise to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.

He broke Obama's promise to close the detention center at Guantanamo in the first year.

He broke Obama's promise to make peace with direct, no precondition talks with America 's most hate-filled enemies during his first year in office, ushering in a new era of global cooperation.

He broke Obama's promise to end the hiring of former lobbyists into high White House jobs.

He broke Obama's promise to end no-compete contracts with the government.

He broke Obama's promise to disclose the names of all attendees at closed White House meetings.

He broke Obama's promise for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.

He broke Obama's promise to have chosen a home church to attend Sunday services with his family by Easter of last year.

Yes, it's all George Bush's fault! President Obama is nothing more than a puppet in the never-ending failed Bush administration. If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, all of President Obama's problems would be solved. His promises would have been kept, the economy would be back on track, Iran would have stopped its work on developing a nuclear bomb and
would be negotiating a peace treaty with Israel . North Korea would have ended its tyrannical regime, and integrity would have been restored to the federal government.

Oh, and did I mention what it would be like, if the Democrats, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, didn't have the heavy yoke of George Bush around their necks? There would be no ear marks, no closed-door drafting of bills, no increase in deficit spending, no special-interest influence (unions), no vote buying (Nebraska, Louisiana).

If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, we'd have real change by now.

All the broken promises, all the failed legislation and delay (health care reform, immigration reform) is not President Obama's fault or the fault of the Democrat-controlled Congress. It's all George Bush's fault !

Take for example the decision of Eric Holder, the president's attorney general, to hold terrorists' trials in New York City . Or his decision to try the Christmas Day underpants bomber as a civilian.

Two disastrous decisions.

Certainly those were bad judgments based on poor advice from George Bush!

Need more proof?

You might recall that when Scott Brown won the election to the U.S.
Senate from Massachusetts , capturing "The Ted Kennedy Seat", President Obama said, Brown's victory was the result of the same voter anger that propelled Obama into office in 2008. People were still angry about George Bush and the policies of the past 10 years. And they wanted change.

Yes, according to the president, the voter rebellion in Massachusetts was George Bush's fault.

Therefore, in retaliation, they elected a Republican to the Ted Kennedy seat, ending a half-century of domination by Democrats. It is all George Bush's fault! Will the failed administration of George Bush ever end, and the time for hope and change ever arrive???

Will President Obama ever accept responsibility for something/anything?

(Chuck Green is a veteran Colorado journalist and former editor-in-chief of The Denver Post.)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120741)12/29/2011 6:10:31 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224728
 
Odumbama's Class Warfare Bashes 'The Rich,' Free Markets By RALPH R. REILAND Posted 07:03 PM ET

President Obama kicked off a speech in Osawatomie, Kan., earlier this month with a positive nod to free market economics.

Referring to Theodore Roosevelt's economic beliefs, Obama acknowledged that the free market system has been the most successful system in history in delivering the highest standard of living to the greatest number of people.

"(Roosevelt) believed then what we know is true today, that the free market is the greatest force for economic progress in human history," the president said. "It's led to a prosperity and a standard of living unmatched by the rest of the world."

But then Obama added a big disclaimer by saying "Roosevelt also knew that the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can."

That opens the door to more than putting Bernie Madoff in jail. Given the high degree of elasticity in their egalitarian and income-redistribution goals, it can give a free license to politicians and central planners to take whatever they can from whomever they can.

Obama then focused on his recurring theme of how "the rich" are getting too wealthy and aren't doing their "fair share" while everyone else is getting the short end of the stick.

He didn't mention the latest Internal Revenue Service reports, for calendar year 2009, that show the top 1% of income earners, those making at least $343,947, earned 16.9% of the nation's adjusted gross income and paid 36.7% of all federal individual income taxes.

Obama also didn't mention that the Internal Revenue Service's tax data show the top 5% of the nation's income earners paid a larger share of total federal individual income taxes than the bottom 95% of earners.

The top 5% of income earners, making $154,643 and up, earned 31.7% of the nation's total adjusted gross income and paid 58.7% of all federal individual income taxes collected, while the bottom 95% of income earners received 68.3% of total income and paid 41.3% of all federal individual income taxes.

Nor did the president mention what the allegedly "unfair" supertop earners pay.

The 2009 IRS data show the top 0.1% of income earners (the top 10% of the top 1% of earners) earned 7.8% of the nation's total adjusted gross income and paid 17.1% of the nation's total federal individual income taxes.

"The average income for a tax return in the top 0.1% was $4.4 million in 2009, while the average amount of income taxes paid was $1.07 million, indicating an average effective individual income-tax rate of 24.3%," reports the Tax Foundation.

Tax Trickery

It also notes that "this very top income group has a lower average effective income tax rate than the rest of the top 1% of returns because these extremely high-income returns are more likely to have income from capital gains and dividends," income that "has already been taxed once by the corporate income tax."

In other words, the aforementioned 24.3% tax rate understates the actual income-tax rate paid by the top 0.1% of income earners.

"Long before the recession hit, hard work stopped paying off for too many people," Obama continued in his Osawatomie speech.

"Fewer and fewer of the folks who contributed to the success of our economy actually benefited from that success. Those at the very top grew wealthier from their incomes and their investments — wealthier than ever before."

In fact, prior to the financial crisis and economic crash of 2008, the Census Bureau reported that income inequality in 2007 had fallen to its lowest level in six years and that the median income, adjusted for inflation, had increased for the third year in a row.

The share of national income going to the top 20% of households in 2007 declined to its smallest share since 2002, reported the Census Bureau, producing greater income equality as the middle class got richer and the top quintile received a smaller slice of the total income pie.

Then came the 2008 financial collapse and subsequent recession — when, as Obama put it in his Kansas speech, "the house of cards collapsed."

Predisposed to blame "the rich," Obama described the collapse as follows:

"We all know the story by now. Mortgages sold to people who couldn't afford them, or even sometimes understand them. Banks and investors allowed to keep packaging the risk and selling it off. Huge bets, and huge bonuses, made with other people's money on the line."

In short, he asserted, the "breathtaking greed of a few" in the private sector caused the problem, along with some inept government regulators.

Obama said nothing about the "breathtaking greed" for votes and power among the pro-redistribution politicians who got no small number of toxic balls rolling through the financial system by pushing for nothing-down loans on home mortgages for fully unqualified buyers.

Gov't Role In Crisis? Ignored

Rather than pointing to the housing collapse as a clear example of how unintended consequences flow from ill-conceived government policies, Obama spotlighted only the "mortgage lenders that tricked families into buying homes they couldn't afford."

Shifting to the allegedly increasing hopelessness of America's poor in terms of upward mobility, Obama described a long and downward road that was plunging more Americans into destitution, a grim picture not unlike the one painted by Karl Marx in which the proletariat was faced with an inevitable and increasing "miserization" under the capitalist system.

"You know, a few years after World War II, a child who was born into poverty had a slightly better than 50-50 chance of becoming middle class as an adult," said Obama. "By 1990, that chance had fallen to around 40%. And if the trend of rising inequality over the last few decades continues, it's estimated that a child born today will only have a 1-in-3 chance of making it to the middle class — 33%."

Choosing to argue that more taxes on "the rich" would correct this alleged lack of upward mobility, and to focus on collective guilt at the top to win political points by appealing to class divisions, Obama didn't mention how the economic future and upward mobility of children is directly and negatively impacted when 40% of children in America are now born out of wedlock and when 70% of children in the black community are now in single-parent households.

In 1963, when Obama says there was more upward mobility among the poor, only 7% of children in the U.S. were born out of wedlock.

Obama didn't mention that single-parent families are particularly vulnerable to poverty.

"In 2009, 44.3% of children living in a female-headed household experienced poverty, as did 26.5% of children living in a male-headed household, reports "Child Health USA 2011," a publication of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

"Only 11.1% of children living in married-couple families lived in poverty" — one-fourth the rate of poverty in female-headed households.

In his Nov. 1 column "The Wrong Inequality," New York Times columnist David Brooks stated that "it is easier to talk about the inequality of stock options than it is to talk inequalities of family structure, child rearing patterns, and educational attainment."

"That's because many people are wedded to the notion that our problems are caused by an oppressive privileged class that perpetually keeps its boot stomped on the neck of the common man."

The growth in wealth of the top 1%, said Brooks, is "not nearly as big a problem" as the "disorganized social fabric" at the bottom when it comes to inequality and stagnant social mobility.

And what's happening at the very top, while the poor are allegedly being held back and "tricked" by the rich? "Some billionaires have a tax rate as low as 1% — one percent!," declared President Obama. "That is the height of unfairness."

To which the Washington Post's "Fact Checker" column responded: "An administration official conceded the White House had no actual data to back up the president's assertion."



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120741)12/29/2011 8:29:42 AM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224728
 
kenny...hussein obama will do anything to get back in White house..despicable things you far left democrats. :-(

'Occupy' activists meet in Iowa for caucus 'events'
Iowa GOP moving vote-count to 'undisclosed location'
By JONATHAN MARTIN |
12/27/11
politico.com

Threats to disrupt the Iowa Republican caucuses next week have prompted state GOP officials to move the vote tabulation to an "undisclosed location," POLITICO has learned.

The state party has not yet told the campaigns exactly where the returns will be added up, only that it will be off-site from the Iowa GOP's Des Moines headquarters. The 2008 caucus results were tabulated at the state party offices, which sit just a few blocks from the state capitol.

Activist groups including the Occupy movement have indicated that they'll attempt to interrupt rallies in the closing days before next Tuesday's caucuses.

The AP reported today that Occupy is making plans to even attend some caucuses and vote "no preference," but not disturb the voting process.

But Iowa Republicans are also bracing for other threats, sources say, including hacking.

Iowa GOP Chair Matt Strawn wouldn't comment on the plan to move the vote-counting except to say they're increasing security measures.

"The Iowa GOP is taking additional safeguards to ensure the Caucus results are tabulated and reported to the public in an accurate and timely manner," Strawn said. "We are not commenting on specific security procedures."



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120741)12/29/2011 8:34:23 AM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224728
 
ken..Some reading for you about your idol... What an awful thingie.

Another look at Ayers-Obama connection
: December 28, 2011
jack Cashill
wnd.com

A little more than three years ago, I first posited on these pages the unwelcome truth that Bill Ayers was the primary craftsman behind Barack Obama's acclaimed 1995 memoir, "Dreams From My Father."

So taboo was the subject, however, that in the years since not one critic, left or right, academic or journalistic, has dared to explore it in print.

To make such an exploration easy, I will volunteer to any serious critic my digital copies of "Dreams" and Ayers's 2001 memoir, "Fugitive Days."

To make it easier still, I will recommend that critics do what I did in a few spare hours over Christmas: cross-check just the first few pages of "Fugitive Days" with "Dreams" and follow the threads where they lead. Here is what I found, much of it new to me.

•"Fugitive Days" opens in media res with a dramatic phone call. The 20-something Ayers learns that there has been an "accident." Says the caller, "Diana is dead," Ayers has a hard time understanding. "Diana is dead," the caller "repeats slowly." Ayers drops the line, and the conversation ends abruptly.

•"Dreams" also opens in media res with a dramatic phone call. The 20-something Obama learns that there has been an "accident." The caller says, "Listen, Barry, your father is dead." Obama has a hard time understanding. "Can you hear me?" she repeats. "I say, your father is dead." The line is cut, and the conversation ends abruptly.

•Ayers imposes a fugitive's worldview on Obama's charmed life. In his own book's opening, Ayers tells us that his world "spins further and further out of control." Obama's New York is "out of control" as well. Working in corporate New York, Obama sees himself as being "behind enemy lines." More literally perhaps, Ayers and pals likewise find themselves "behind enemy lines."

•As a fugitive, Ayers sees himself as "everywhere an outsider." Obama also "knew how to live as an outsider" and feared that he "would forever remain an outsider."

•Ayers traces his alienation back to his youth when he first felt that "cold touch of abandonment." Obama traces his alienation back to "the sense of abandonment [he'd] felt as a boy."

•In this opening sequence Ayers uses the words "solitary" and "escape." Obama will use the former word 12 times, the latter word 23. As a control, I checked my own semi-memoir, "Sucker Punch." I use "escape" four times and "solitary" not at all.

•Not being on the run, Obama "had nothing to escape from except [his] own inner doubt." Ayers has only scorn for those "untroubled by doubt." He struggles with "doubts and fears," "doubt and apprehension," "doubts or questions." Obama contends with "doubt and confusion," "tension and doubt," "anger and doubt."

•Ayers confesses in his book's opening to being "gripped suddenly with fear, then naked panic." Says Obama, "I was gripped with panic. Then the panic gave way to anger."

•Both authors inhabit a world of angry people, none more so than their indignant selves. Obama uses the word "angry" 23 times. We learn in "Dreams" of a man who "snorts like an angry bull." The police in Ayers's Chicago, their "nostrils flaring," stampede through the streets "like angry cattle."

•Ayers struggled with his "interior anger." Obama endured an "interior struggle."

•Ayers and Obama speak of "rage" the way that Eskimos do of snow – in so many varieties, so often, that they feel the need to qualify it, as Obama does when he speaks of "impressive rage," "suppressed rage" or "coil of rage."

•Contra Dinesh D'Souza, the "roots of Obama's rage" trace not to Obama Sr. but to Bill Ayers. In "Sucker Punch," I do not speak of "anger" or "rage" in regard to myself at all.

•A few pages into "Fugitive Days," Ayers tells us that his mother's "script was already written." He wants nothing to do "with the scripted lives we were expected to lead."

•Obama too fears he is "living out a preordained script," the same one that made his father a "captive to his tragedy." The fact that Diana Oughton was a "captive to her own dreams," writes Ayers, led to her tragic ending.

•To break out of such captivity, Ayers knew he had to "push the limits. Cross the borders." Obama was not sure he could. "Instead," says Obama, "I drew a series of circles around myself, with borders that shifted as time passed."

•"I longed to run away and write my own story," Ayers writes. Obama too wanted to construct "my story" out of the African-American experience.

•"Fugitive Days" is laced with repeated reference to what Ayers calls "our constructed reality." So too is "Dreams." Obama describes his own early attempts at biography as "something I'd constructed from the scraps of information I'd picked up from my mother."

•This was the first time I noticed the "scripted" metaphor, but as I detail in "Deconstructing Obama," Ayers transformed Obama, elsewhere a stumbling literalist, into a sophisticated postmodernist.

•In both books there are multiple references to "constructs," "stories," "narratives," "struggles," "fictions," "journeys," "traps" and even advanced bits of postmodern patois like the "grooves" into which they have fallen, the "poses" they assume and the "stitched together" nature of the lives people lead. Most memoirs, my own included, avoid all this jabberwocky.

•In his memoir, Ayers often fuses the imperatives of the postmodernist with those of the fugitive as in the sentiment, "Our job was to create ourselves anew." The key to that self-creation in both senses was "this one small hard thing: discipline."

•Obama treasured these same virtues in Malcolm X. "His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me," says Obama. Malcolm's words "promised a new and uncompromising order, martial on its discipline."

•Not surprisingly, Ayers sees the need for "uncompromising militancy" and "uncompromising resistance." He named his first child "Malik" in honor of Malcolm X's Muslim designation.

•In the opening pages of "Fugitive Days," Ayers introduces the concept of the "traveler," again both literal and figurative, as in when he thanks "all those who traveled these fugitive roads."

•When he proposes "to travel a narrower, more personal course," Obama also uses "travel" existentially and, like Ayers, he employs it as a transitive verb with an object

•Both use the word "wander" in a variety of forms, literally and figuratively, Ayers 13 times, Obama 25. In "Sucker Punch," I use the word "wander" once.

•A one-time merchant seaman, Ayers introduces his first nautical metaphor, "sinking ship," just 600 words into his memoir. Obama also uses "sinking ship" metaphorically. In "Deconstructing Obama," I identify at least 55 nautical words or phrases that both authors use. I match on fewer than 10.

•Ayers likes to use punchy action verbs. Here are those he uses in one form or another in the first 1,000 words of "Fugitive Days": groan, grip, flicker, choke, beat, bake, chatter, flutter, roar, explode, leap, pitch, rush, blow, scatter, scoop, sob, snatch, sink, slouch, stumble, struggle, spin, stagger, scratch, smudge, wobble, pump, plunge, pant, trample, whiz.

•Obama uses every one of these verbs, most of them multiple times, except for "whiz," a word that Ayers only uses once. In "Sucker Punch," I match on about half of these verbs, and mine is a book about boxing.

•Unaided, Obama tends to the awkward, passive and verbose. On his own, he was never capable of writing a publishable book, let alone one that Time magazine would call "the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician."
The real scandal, as I have come to believe, is not that Ayers helped his struggling protégé, not even that Obama has continually lied about their relationship, but rather that the literary and media establishment has refused to investigate the most potentially consequential – and most obvious – literary fraud of our time.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (120741)12/29/2011 11:25:45 AM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 224728
 
Who do you suppose they will vote for and why?