Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (16071)	12/29/2011 12:40:59 AM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Re:<"Of course there is risk to XTR in signing this agreement and making public statements about it. If JBI turned out to be a scam or if JBI provided substandard fuels to XTR, XTR would suffer significant negative public perception to the brand."> So take me through a scenario...something like someone will stop at an XTR gas station and someone else will whisper, "You don't want to get gas here--they had an agreement with a company which turned out to be a scam and the scam company didn't deliver fuel to XTR like they said they would so XTR never bought anything from them!" Here's a thought--you purchased stock from Mr. Bordynuik without first testing his fuel. Do you think if you're wrong and Mr. Bordynuik turns out to be a swindler, that you'll suffer from signficant negative public perception?? It should be worse with you because you actually entered into a transaction whereas XTR wouldn't have.