SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (178392)1/1/2012 10:19:16 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543056
 
How in the world do you see krugmans piece NOT urging a housing bubble? ...............Krugmans right call here would have been to say ..." Greenspan should be very careful here to NOT create a housing bubble. By pushing interest rates unnaturally low, Greenspan has the potential to create another bubble and all the downside and pain that will bring." ....He didn't say that he said the opposite.

"it [fed] needs soaring household spending". In other words krugman is urging an already heavily indebted public to go spend a lot. soaring!! The only way they can do this is through more long term debt. That "soaring" that Krugman wanted AND GOT led to an over indebted banking system and public. Krugman here is trying to rewrite history, trying to suggest that his words didn't mean what he said.

To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.



To: bentway who wrote (178392)1/1/2012 11:51:17 AM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 543056
 
Nicely done. It's reasonably clear that Krugman is being ironic here, not an advocate. But folk will believe what folk will believe.