Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (48857)	1/3/2012 3:06:26 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Wanna bet that his secretary has a higher* EFFECTIVE... INCOME TAX rate than that?* Its possible, but only if the secretary is highly compensated (which is likely so, as the executive assistant to a major CEO), and at the same time doesn't take have a large number of tax breaks. Most secretaries do not pay that much as their effective income tax rate. As I said before - "most secretaries don't make 6 figures, and most people who do make six figures have plenty of deductions and credits." As for nominal, if you mean the nominal top marginal rate, then sure, the secretary has a higher tax rate, but if your arguing the issue in the sense of what's fair (rather than in terms of incentives) it would seem the actual percentage paid is more important. If it is the case that Buffet is particularly good at lowering his effective tax rate (at least if you ignore the taxes paid by the companies he is a major owner of), and his secretary is bad (or at least not unusually good) at avoiding taxes (and also unusually highly compensated), then perhaps Buffet does pay a higher effective tax rate (without documentation from both of them we can't be sure), but if so that's a big step from the norm. Whether you just consider income taxes, or count all federal taxes, the rich pay a lot more (as a percentage, not just in dollar terms) than the non-rich, and while the "uber-rich" may pay less (as a percentage, but not in dollar terms) than the rich, they pay more than the norm.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (48857)	1/3/2012 4:19:08 PM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

Do you know how silly an analogy is when the person being exemplified in a small company is not identifiable? Who is Warren Buffet's secretary? theatlantic.com Apparently Warren Buffet is a big fan of having his income taxed multiple times. If he likes it perhaps the tax forms should include a check box asking how many extra times the person would like their income taxed. We know from your previous statements you would automatically check off for at least once extra.