Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5791)	11/21/1997 10:22:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard, I'm hardly a mining maven, so let me get this straight. You're saying that becuase they are only going to initially have five holes that are dispersed throughout this wide playa, people might think that the results were caused by a meteor or just lucky plotting? If they get great results on the first hole, do I chalk that up to some ancesteral cousin of comet Kahoutek(sp?)? I would agree that 1-5 holes does not a mine make. I would also agree that it makes no case whatsoever towards homogeneity. I would think that it does start to give you some idea of what's out there. I wold also think it gives you some idea of the consistency and ability of the Johnson method relative to other methods that have been tried. I don't think that 1-5 holes gives youthe complete and final picture. It may however make the outline become a little more clear. Also, if these numbers are released and if they are good, it will make it unequivocally impossible for the shorts to scream fraud. It will take much of their(but not all)ammo away. IMO Mark